Policing the internal Schengen borders – managing the double bind between free movement and migration control

Abstract

International audienceAnalyses of security practices at borders have focused on the dematerialisation and de-territorialisation of control of individuals’ mobility. This paper explores the nature of the control the state still exercises over individuals’ mobility at national borders. It focuses on a border that is supposed to have been opened, between France and Italy, inside the Schengen Area. It is based on analysis of the practices, representations and organisation of French border police officers, beginning with the legal and organisational transformations due to implementation of the Schengen Convention at the France–Italy border. It then turns to the study of border police officers’ targeting practices, using Heyman's notion of a ‘plausible story’. Finally, it assesses the influence of deportation practices on the territoriality of the control of individuals’ mobility, as well as its effects on targeting practices. These borders are at the core of the interaction between the construction of a new, European political centre, and the affirmation of an older one, the national, political centre. This paper demonstrates that border police officers are in charge of dealing with the tension, a double bind of sorts, emerging from this interaction. National, internal borders are still a site in which the state manages individuals’ mobility

A Patchwork of Intra-Schengen Policing: Border Games over National Identity and National Sovereignty

“…Such an overview is non-existent, as a result of which it is basically unclear what is happening at Europe’s intra-Schengen borders, and why, when and against whom border controls are exercised. These questions can solely be fully addressed by carrying out ethnographic fieldwork in the various intra-Schengen border areas, and although there is a growing number of studies shining empirical light on these—and other—questions (Barker, 2018; Casella Colombeau, 2015; Cheliotis, 2017; De Genova, 2017; Dekkers, 2019; Fabini, 2017; Franko and Gundhus, 2015; Pakes and Holt, 2017; Van Der Woude and Brouwer, 2017; Van Der Woude and Van Der Leun, 2017; Wonders, 2017), the empirical picture of what is actually happening in intra-Schengen border areas is still very limited. For the scope of this article, I will draw from the limited case law of the Court of Justice for the European Union (CJEU) on article 23 SBC and a recent query that was launched by the European Migration Network.…”

(Cr)immigrant framing in border areas: decision-making processes of Dutch border police officers

“…Despite the fact that immigration officers in border areas seem to play a crucial role in deciding who belongs, there have been very few empirical examinations of the decision-making processes of border policing officers (see for notable exceptions: Gilboy 1991, Pratt and Thompson 2008, Weber 2011, Pickering and Ham 2013, Casella Colombeau 2015. Meanwhile a wealth of studies has addressed decision-making processes of regular police officers, and the issue of ethno-racial profiling in stop-and-search contexts in particular (Holmberg 2000, Waddington et al 2004, Wilson et al 2004, Alpert et al 2005, Dunham 2005, Schafer et al 2006, Stroshine et al 2008, Parmar 2011, Quinton 2011, Fallik and Novak 2012, Tillyer 2012, Mutsaers 2014.…”

Belonging and Transnational Refugee Settlement

“…A particular contemporary issue arises from the mass migrations of displaced people in Europe as the notion of national borders is, in many ways, imagined (even though thousands of kilometres of razor wire provide a worrying and stark physical presence). Numerous analysts posit that the recent mass migrations into Europe represent significant problems for the European Union's Schengen Zone and the 1990 Dublin Convention (Casella Colombeau, 2015;Kasparek, 2016). 15 Examples of populist uprisings across Europe signal fundamental changes to its governance, identity and ability to coordinate multinational solutions in relation to the so-called migrant crisis where strident forms of nationalism and protectionism are taking root.…”