2012
DOI: 10.1093/police/pas022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Police Authorities, Accountability, and Citizenship

Abstract: SynopsisPolicing has recently attracted a great deal of controversy set against the recent wave of student disturbances and the use of paramilitary tactics to disperse, contain and kettle protestors. Moreover, the controversial application of stop and search powers under the Terrorism Act 2000 has raised further questions about the accountability of the police.The responsibility of holding the police to account currently falls to the 43 police authorities operating across England and Wales. This paper draws on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before the elections, the tripartite structure existed with the aim of enabling scrutiny of the Chief Constable through the police authorities, who also played a role in setting the strategic direction for the force. However, the argument was made by many, that police authorities were failing at these activities because they had insufficient knowledge about their roles, and they lacked the formal powers needed to exert real influence (Millen and Stephens, 2012). In addition to this, public awareness of police authorities was almost non-existent (Myhill et al, 2003), which was deemed to be an acute failure given that policing should enforce the law on behalf of and with the support of the community it serves (Scarman, 1986, p. 4.60).…”
Section: Scrutiny: What Is Changed?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before the elections, the tripartite structure existed with the aim of enabling scrutiny of the Chief Constable through the police authorities, who also played a role in setting the strategic direction for the force. However, the argument was made by many, that police authorities were failing at these activities because they had insufficient knowledge about their roles, and they lacked the formal powers needed to exert real influence (Millen and Stephens, 2012). In addition to this, public awareness of police authorities was almost non-existent (Myhill et al, 2003), which was deemed to be an acute failure given that policing should enforce the law on behalf of and with the support of the community it serves (Scarman, 1986, p. 4.60).…”
Section: Scrutiny: What Is Changed?mentioning
confidence: 99%