1987
DOI: 10.1063/1.338956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarized light scattering from metal surfaces

Abstract: The stretching and bending of polished and industrial-grade metallurgical surfaces changes the appearance of the specimen’s surface. The changes in surface structure can be detected in the polarized light scattered from the surface cracks and other defects, which act as scattering centers. In order to interpret light scattering signals from complex surfaces, we first examine the nature of light scattered from a perfect mirror surface, a degraded mirror, a line on a mirror, a randomly sanded surface, and, final… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17,28 Even if the materials are confined to be the same and the differences among samples are confined to only surface condition, depolarization is still related to microcosmic height/particle distribution (geometric property) in the nonlinear Rayleigh scattering or near-linear Mie scattering levels. 19,20,33,34 Meanwhile, even on highly conductive metal surfaces that are comparatively simple because of the lack of multilayer reflection (although they cannot be treated as an ideal conductor because of the light wavelength), comparatively few publications are found on studying the mechanism of depolarization in the light scattering at imperfectly random rough surfaces that have statistical height distributions of non-Gaussian ones (that are quite general in practical polished or textured surfaces). [20][21][22][23]35,36 Bickel et al briefly reported the depolarization effect in Stokes vectors (macrocosmic expression) of the scratches/lines on both perfect mirror and randomly sanded brass surfaces using a He-Cd laser source with beam diameter of 600 µm, 20,23 but there is no further quantitative comparison maybe mainly due to the limitation in the lack of precise submicro or nm-level geometric information at that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17,28 Even if the materials are confined to be the same and the differences among samples are confined to only surface condition, depolarization is still related to microcosmic height/particle distribution (geometric property) in the nonlinear Rayleigh scattering or near-linear Mie scattering levels. 19,20,33,34 Meanwhile, even on highly conductive metal surfaces that are comparatively simple because of the lack of multilayer reflection (although they cannot be treated as an ideal conductor because of the light wavelength), comparatively few publications are found on studying the mechanism of depolarization in the light scattering at imperfectly random rough surfaces that have statistical height distributions of non-Gaussian ones (that are quite general in practical polished or textured surfaces). [20][21][22][23]35,36 Bickel et al briefly reported the depolarization effect in Stokes vectors (macrocosmic expression) of the scratches/lines on both perfect mirror and randomly sanded brass surfaces using a He-Cd laser source with beam diameter of 600 µm, 20,23 but there is no further quantitative comparison maybe mainly due to the limitation in the lack of precise submicro or nm-level geometric information at that time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…19,20,33,34 Meanwhile, even on highly conductive metal surfaces that are comparatively simple because of the lack of multilayer reflection (although they cannot be treated as an ideal conductor because of the light wavelength), comparatively few publications are found on studying the mechanism of depolarization in the light scattering at imperfectly random rough surfaces that have statistical height distributions of non-Gaussian ones (that are quite general in practical polished or textured surfaces). [20][21][22][23]35,36 Bickel et al briefly reported the depolarization effect in Stokes vectors (macrocosmic expression) of the scratches/lines on both perfect mirror and randomly sanded brass surfaces using a He-Cd laser source with beam diameter of 600 µm, 20,23 but there is no further quantitative comparison maybe mainly due to the limitation in the lack of precise submicro or nm-level geometric information at that time. Crespo et al did plenty of numerical simulations on rough random surfaces that had R q of 0.1-2λ generated using Monte Carlo method, 21 but no depolarization effects were accounted as they studied one-dimensional (1D) surfaces and treated the surfaces as perfectly conductive ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scattering of light from a rough surface has been a subject of intensive study for many decades since all surfaces are rough to some extent. The studies have mainly been performed either from the material surface characterization perspective [14] or were efforts towards building perfect mirrors [15,16]. Broadly speaking, rough surfaces are typically characterized as "weak" or "strong" rough surfaces based on the "rms" roughness and characteristic length (correlation length) with respect to the incident light wavelength [16].…”
Section: Optical Transition Radiation From a Rough Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(8) The primed coordinate system tracks the sample orientation in terms of the laboratory-based coordinate system.…”
Section: A Converting Goniometer Angles To Sample Reference Frame Anmentioning
confidence: 99%