2015
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization modulation adds little additional information to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, this technique has potential direct applications in single molecule co-localization experiments to discriminate between molecules at a distance below the optical resolution of biological sensors, increase contrast at the nanometer scale of polarization images, or explain increased image quality in super-resolution techniques based on PR microscopy [18][19][20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, this technique has potential direct applications in single molecule co-localization experiments to discriminate between molecules at a distance below the optical resolution of biological sensors, increase contrast at the nanometer scale of polarization images, or explain increased image quality in super-resolution techniques based on PR microscopy [18][19][20]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting images are analyzed with a statistics-based algorithm that provides the best set of parameters (fluorophore orientation and emitted intensity) in every region of the sample that fits the actual overall modulation. Although some controversy on the performance of the technique has been addressed, claiming that the PR adds little to the super-resolution capability of the stimulated emission depletion (STED) technique [20], the PR images provide a greater amount of information, which has been used in the past to obtain structural information [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In addition, it is clear that the extra information can be used to improve an image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27] Later Frahm and Keller showed however that their results were in fact not based on polarization control but due to post processing of the data by a sparsity enhancing deconvolution algorithm. [28] Closer inspection of the data of Hafi and co-workers reveals that they reported very poor modulation depths when changing the polarization (their Figure 2). Two experimental factors might have caused these poor modulation depths, thereby impairing their results, while the conceptual idea is working, as we demonstrate below.…”
Section: Fluorescence Polarization Controlmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There also has been an interesting debate on whether polarization modulation adds super resolution or not. 63,64 Super resolution dipole orientation mapping (SDOM) extended SPoD with measurement of dipole orientations, which adds promptly evidence to the debate. 18 Instead of the SPEED algorithm in SPoD, SDOM establishes a polarization-variant model, in which the intensity determines the super-resolution microscopic image using sparsity-enhanced deconvolution, while the phase determines the e®ective dipole orientation of each super-resolved focal volume using least squares estimation, thus fully exploiting the polarization modulation information.…”
Section: Super-resolution Techniques In Fpmmentioning
confidence: 99%