1995
DOI: 10.1063/1.114746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization instability and relative intensity noise in vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers

Abstract: We observe a polarization instability in circularly symmetric vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. A relatively long time, 3–5 ns, is required to establish a dominant polarization state. Under high-speed digital modulation this leads to strong enhancement, 20–30 dB, in polarization resolved low-frequency relative intensity noise. This polarization instability is accurately described by a simple rate-equation model. A similar increase in relative intensity noise, under dc bias, is caused by energy partition… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we studied the polarization properties of the transient response. It had been shown that these devices usually present a dominant polarization state during dc operation [14], [15] and that the characteristic time for achieving this state is of the order of a few nanoseconds [16], [17]. Our measurements complement this knowledge, showing that the two polarization states of all the transverse modes are present during subnanosecond excitation and that they evolve with the same dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, we studied the polarization properties of the transient response. It had been shown that these devices usually present a dominant polarization state during dc operation [14], [15] and that the characteristic time for achieving this state is of the order of a few nanoseconds [16], [17]. Our measurements complement this knowledge, showing that the two polarization states of all the transverse modes are present during subnanosecond excitation and that they evolve with the same dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In spite of the lack of polarization selection, one of these two states is usually dominant during dc operation. It has been shown that the characteristic time for establishing a dominant polarization state is of the order of 2-5 ns for a gain-guided VCSEL [16]. Polarization switching between these polarized states has also been reported during slow [15], [23] and fast [24] current ramp excitations.…”
Section: Polarization Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the assumption that the fundamental mode contributes more on-axis power and higher order modes contribute more power in the wings of the beam distribution, it appears that the oxideconfined devices in this study behave opposite to those in [7]. Here, the fundamental mode appears to overshoot and highorder mode undershoots.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Prior investigations of polarization resolved waveforms led the authors of [7] to conclude that a low-to-high drive transition on an implant-confined VCSEL caused the high-order mode to overshoot and the low-order mode to undershoot. With the assumption that the fundamental mode contributes more on-axis power and higher order modes contribute more power in the wings of the beam distribution, it appears that the oxideconfined devices in this study behave opposite to those in [7].…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%