Polarization and acculturation in US Election 2016 outcomes – Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences

Abstract

Elections are among the most critical events in a national calendar. During elections, candidates increasingly use social media platforms to engage voters. Using the 2016 US presidential election as a case study, we looked at the use of Twitter by political campaigns and examined how the drivers of voter behaviour were reflected in Twitter. Social media analytics have been used to derive insights related to theoretical frameworks within political science. Using social media analytics, we investigated whether the nature of social media discussions have an impact on voting behaviour during an election, through acculturation of ideologies and polarization of voter preferences. Our findings indicate that discussions on Twitter could have polarized users significantly. Reasons behind such polarization were explored using Newman and Sheth's model of voter's choice behaviour. Geographical analysis of tweets, users, and campaigns suggests acculturation of ideologies among voting groups. Finally, network analysis among voters indicates that polarization may have occurred due to differences between the respective online campaigns. This study thus provides important and highly relevant insights into voter behaviour for the future management and governance of successful political campaigns. deliberative democracy among voters (Lawrence et al., 2010;Yardi and Boyd, 2010). Deliberation may help voters in: (a) refining their own opinions; (b) listening to different opinions; and (c) identifying

Predicting Information Diffusion on Twitter a Deep Learning Neural Network Model Using Custom Weighted Word Features

“…Many researchers from their work have proved the potential of SMA across different academic disciplines and business domains. Prior work strongly shows that SMA can provide important insights around disciplines such as marketing [14], in deliberation on political [15] and social concerns [16], in emergency [17], for building public relation [18] or even ruling out possibility of polarization of any major event [19]. Social media platforms like Twitter can also help us to gain insights into any specific domain [20] or technology [21].…”

Reddit: Affordances as an Enabler for Shifting Loyalties

“…Xenos et al (2014) found a strong positive relationship between social media use and political engagement among young people in UK, USA and Australia. Grover et al (2018) investigated whether the nature of social media discussions have an impact on voting behaviour during an election and found that discussions on Twitter could have polarized users significantly. Consequently, as these studies demonstrate that social media influences political participation and social movements, we argue that this influence is facilitated by the affordances that the unique features of the media platform allow.…”

Measuring and Unpacking Affective Polarization on Twitter: The Role of Party and Gender in the 2018 Senate Races

“…In 280 characters or less, a candidate, journalist, or voter can publish their thoughts for others to see. While discussions questioning the validity of polls and their predictive power on election outcomes have increasingly circulated since Donald Trump's victory in 2016, Twitter's role has only broadened, transforming it into a catalyst for political communication as well as a gauge for public opinion [24,53].…”