2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7955-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarity Reversals from Paleomagnetic Observations and Numerical Dynamo Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the rotated Y 0 2 case contains polar cooling that according to most studies may suppress reversals Kutzner and Christensen 2004). Polar cooling results in axial-dipole dominance due to flux concentration at high-latitudes (Amit et al 2010b) and therefore indeed suppresses reversals (a state termed geographic control by Olson and Amit 2014). However, when the dynamo is far from the onset of reversals, Olson and Amit (2014) found that the opposite occurs and polar cooling increases reversal frequency by producing more turbulent conditions (which they termed inertial control).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In particular, the rotated Y 0 2 case contains polar cooling that according to most studies may suppress reversals Kutzner and Christensen 2004). Polar cooling results in axial-dipole dominance due to flux concentration at high-latitudes (Amit et al 2010b) and therefore indeed suppresses reversals (a state termed geographic control by Olson and Amit 2014). However, when the dynamo is far from the onset of reversals, Olson and Amit (2014) found that the opposite occurs and polar cooling increases reversal frequency by producing more turbulent conditions (which they termed inertial control).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Biases of estimated ages in sediments result from uncertainties in the age constraints, unknown lock-in depths, and unknown processes of remanence acquisition (Sagnotti, 2018;Sagnotti et al, 2005;Valet & Fournier, 2016). Moreover, spatial differences in the expression of a reversal may result from nondipolar field configurations during reversals (e.g., Amit et al, 2010;Brown et al, 2007;Leonhardt & Fabian, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent dipole decrease is considered part of a trend that has continued for the last 2000 yr (Merrill and McElhinny, 1983) and a more rapid poleward drift of the dipole axis in the past 50 yr has also been suggested (Amit et al, 2010). Analyzing the past 150 yr of magnetic data, a more significant decay of the geomagnetic dipole intensity was found (Gubbins, 1987;Gubbins et al, 2006), much faster than the rate of free decay in the Earth's core (Olson and Amit, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%