Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.1994.383334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarity dependence of dielectric breakdown in scaled SiO/sub 2/

Abstract: We have investigated polarity dependence of dielectric breakdown under constant current stress in scaled S io2 dielectrics. Results show that high-field-induced interface state generation is reduced as oxide thickness scales down and charge-to-breakdown (QBD) for positive gate bias (+V,) increases with decreasing oxide thickness. However, QBD for negative gate bias (-Vg) shows an opposite vend to QBD(+Vg), i.e. QBD(-V~) decreases dramatically with decreasing oxide thickness. Therefore, there is an increased p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 reveals the leakage current at 1 V for the control NO, N2ONO, and ON dielectrics, and all meet the requirement of the industry specification, which is less than 1 fA/cell. Nevertheless, the physical thickness of the ON dielectric was thinner than the control NO, the leakage current of the ON dielectric almost makes no difference, and this result can be attributed to the strengthening of the oxide by reducing the amount of the distorted bonds through the nitrogen incorporation [11] and to the improved nitride quality due to a low-pressure N 2 O treatment, which is more efficient in reducing the H-related species than the one-atmosphere O 2 oxidation used in the control NO [12]. Another possible explanation for the suppressed leakage current of the ON dielectric is the lessened nonuniform filamentary current at the oxide/bottom electrode (Si buried plate) interface than that of the control NO, which emanated from atomically rough oxide/top electrode (poly-Si) interface [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2 reveals the leakage current at 1 V for the control NO, N2ONO, and ON dielectrics, and all meet the requirement of the industry specification, which is less than 1 fA/cell. Nevertheless, the physical thickness of the ON dielectric was thinner than the control NO, the leakage current of the ON dielectric almost makes no difference, and this result can be attributed to the strengthening of the oxide by reducing the amount of the distorted bonds through the nitrogen incorporation [11] and to the improved nitride quality due to a low-pressure N 2 O treatment, which is more efficient in reducing the H-related species than the one-atmosphere O 2 oxidation used in the control NO [12]. Another possible explanation for the suppressed leakage current of the ON dielectric is the lessened nonuniform filamentary current at the oxide/bottom electrode (Si buried plate) interface than that of the control NO, which emanated from atomically rough oxide/top electrode (poly-Si) interface [13].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The nitrogen incorporation causes distortion and strain in the SiO 2 network leading to defect creation closer to the substrate during gate injection. 15,16 Since the nitrogen profiles also shifting towards the bulk of the oxide, the general reliability of the oxide degrades as can be seen in the ͑smaller͒ shift in ϩV g Q BD .…”
Section: Microelectronics Research Center the University Of Texas Atmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Polarity-dependent degradation in ultrathin MOSFETs is well known. It is attributed to the presence of defects at the gate/dielectric interface [4], the presence of a structural transition layer at the substrate/dielectric interface [5], or the difference in the electron energy dissipated at the anode which in turn depends on the anode Fermi level [6], [7]. According to this Fermi-level dependent anode hole injection (AHI) model, damage is maximum for p-type anodes where the electron impact generates hot holes.…”
Section: Stress Voltage Polarity Dependence Of Mnsfetsmentioning
confidence: 99%