2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2016.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarimetry, photometry, and spectroscopy of comet C/2009 P1 (Garradd)

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correction for the zero point of instrumental position angle ΔPA was found from observations of standard stars with large interstellar polarization (Hsu and Breger, 1982). The image processing, reduction, errors estimation, and the method of calculation of polarization parameters with SCORPIO-2 are described in more details by Afanasiev and Amirkhanyan (2012), Afanasiev et al (2014), Ivanova et al (2015, 2017a, 2017b), and Rosenbush et al (2017.…”
Section: The Observed Polarization Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correction for the zero point of instrumental position angle ΔPA was found from observations of standard stars with large interstellar polarization (Hsu and Breger, 1982). The image processing, reduction, errors estimation, and the method of calculation of polarization parameters with SCORPIO-2 are described in more details by Afanasiev and Amirkhanyan (2012), Afanasiev et al (2014), Ivanova et al (2015, 2017a, 2017b), and Rosenbush et al (2017.…”
Section: The Observed Polarization Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically the instrumental polarization was less than 0.1%. A detailed description of the data reduction and the method of the calculation of polarization parameters with SCORPIO-2 can be found in Afanasiev & Amirkhanyan (2012), Afanasiev et al (2014), Ivanova et al (2009, 2017a), and Rosenbush et al (2017. The errors in the averaged polarization degree varied from 0.12% in the near-nucleus region to 1.1% in the tail at projected distance ρ from the coma photocenter ∼150 000 km.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exclude spurious features when interpreting the obtained images, each of the digital filters was applied with the same processing parameters for all individual exposures. This technique was used before to pick out structures in several comets with good results (Ivanova et al 2009(Ivanova et al , 2016(Ivanova et al , 2017a(Ivanova et al , 2018Rosenbush et al 2017;Picazzio et al 2019).…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed description of the procedure used to process polarimetric images is given in Refs. [9,22]. Table 1 provides the following information: the date of an observation (the mid-cycle time); the respective heliocentric, r, and geocentric, Δ, distances; the phase angle α; the spectral filter and its effective wavelength λ eff ; the total exposure time T exp ; the degree of linear polarization P; and the name of the comet.…”
Section: Results Of Polarimetric Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%