2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2020.113768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comet 2P/Encke in apparition of 2017: II. Polarization and color

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And at a cometocentric distance of 10,000 km, the gas contributes 1.01 times as much to the brightness of the coma as the dust, which equals to 0.76 mag. Compared to the continuum/emission ratio of 2P/Encke provided in Figure 4 of Kiselev et al (2020), the SED500 filter has a similar central wavelength with the Johnson-Cousins V band presented here, and in both filters the gas contaminations are significant. The continuum/emission ratio of 60P around 10,000 km is much higher than that of 2P/Encke; this is possibly because 2P had a highly active gaseous activity while 60P was comparatively poor in the gas reserves, since it was classified as a depleted comet in A' Hearn et al (1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…And at a cometocentric distance of 10,000 km, the gas contributes 1.01 times as much to the brightness of the coma as the dust, which equals to 0.76 mag. Compared to the continuum/emission ratio of 2P/Encke provided in Figure 4 of Kiselev et al (2020), the SED500 filter has a similar central wavelength with the Johnson-Cousins V band presented here, and in both filters the gas contaminations are significant. The continuum/emission ratio of 60P around 10,000 km is much higher than that of 2P/Encke; this is possibly because 2P had a highly active gaseous activity while 60P was comparatively poor in the gas reserves, since it was classified as a depleted comet in A' Hearn et al (1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…where P obs (ρ) is the observed polarization along the cuts, and P nucl is the polarization of the nucleus. The detailed derivation of this equation is presented by Kiselev et al (2020). We assumed that the polarization of the cometary nucleus is close to the averaged polarization for nuclei of 2P/Encke (Boehnhardt et al 2008) and 133P/Elst-Pizarro (Bagnulo et al 2010); P nucl = -(1.2 ± 0.17)% at the phase angle 10 • .…”
Section: Profiles Of Color and Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assumed that the polarization of the cometary nucleus is close to the averaged polarization for nuclei of 2P/Encke (Boehnhardt et al 2008) and 133P/Elst-Pizarro (Bagnulo et al 2010); P nucl = -(1.2 ± 0.17)% at the phase angle 10 • . Using the technique described by Kiselev et al (2020), we estimated the uncertainty in the coma polarization after correction for the nucleus contribution; the maximum absolute error is ∆P dust coma ≈ 1%.…”
Section: Profiles Of Color and Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively featureless inner coma color and polarization maps of C/2017 K2 stands in contrast to those of C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp), which showed prominent reddened and positively polarized (near +2%) jets superimposed on a strongly negatively polarized (near −5%) halo at a similar α = 6 • .9, but at a closer r = 4.1 au (Hadamcik & Levasseur-Regourd 2003a). Similarly negatively polarized halos appear around a number of periodic comets (Hadamcik & Levasseur-Regourd 2003b;Hadamcik et al 2016), although some of these halos may instead be recording the polarization of the nucleus (Kiselev et al 2020). It remains unclear how many of observed differences are due to true physical differences between the physical properties of these comets, or if similar features will develop on C/2017 K2 as it approaches the Sun.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Distant Cometsmentioning
confidence: 89%