1979
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90118-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
135
1
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
135
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stories can be analyzed as problem-solving tasks, where the protagonist faces sonic problem in the pursuit of his or her goals and has to find a way around it (Rumelhart, 1975). The events in a story that are directly on the path of relationships between the protagonist's initial state and goal state form the backbone of the story, and are thus considered particularly important by the reader and are recalled best (Black & Bower, 1980;de Beaugrande & Colby, 1979;Lehnert, 1980a). However, discourse understanding may rely on many other knowledge sources in content areas other than physical causality and human action.…”
Section: Causes and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Stories can be analyzed as problem-solving tasks, where the protagonist faces sonic problem in the pursuit of his or her goals and has to find a way around it (Rumelhart, 1975). The events in a story that are directly on the path of relationships between the protagonist's initial state and goal state form the backbone of the story, and are thus considered particularly important by the reader and are recalled best (Black & Bower, 1980;de Beaugrande & Colby, 1979;Lehnert, 1980a). However, discourse understanding may rely on many other knowledge sources in content areas other than physical causality and human action.…”
Section: Causes and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one side there are the story grammarians, who postulate that narrative structures do have processing reality (Johnson & Mandler, 1980;Mandler, 1978;Mandler & Johnson, 1977Rumelhart, 1975Rumelhart, , 1980Thorndykc, 1977;Stein & Glenn, 1979). The opposing view is held by those psychologists and scholars from artificial intelligence who claim that such structures are theoretical artifacts which can or should be explained away or modeled in terms of the structure of actions, emphasizing such notions as motivation, purpose, intention, and goal (e.g., Black & Bower, 1980;Bruce, 1980;Schank & Abelson, 1977;Thorndyke & Yekovich, 1980). Black and Wilensky (1979) have argued that there is no theoretically interesting way of formulating grammars for narrative structt.res, and that the actual grammars proposed both in psychology and the theory of discourse cannot be called grammars.…”
Section: Story Grammars and The Narrative Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations