2022
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00191-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-of-care HIV viral load and targeted drug resistance mutation testing versus standard care for Kenyan children on antiretroviral therapy (Opt4Kids): an open-label, randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nationally, suboptimal viral suppression was partially due to the large proportion of children still on NVP or EFV based regimens, known to be associated with high primary resistance [ 39 ], while transition to the newly approved regimen containing LPV/r or Dolutegravir (DTG) started later. However, infants in our cohort were not on NVP based regimen but on LPV/r, and the results of the resistance test imply that the low suppression rate we found cannot be attributed to primary drug resistance to NVP nor to LPV/r [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nationally, suboptimal viral suppression was partially due to the large proportion of children still on NVP or EFV based regimens, known to be associated with high primary resistance [ 39 ], while transition to the newly approved regimen containing LPV/r or Dolutegravir (DTG) started later. However, infants in our cohort were not on NVP based regimen but on LPV/r, and the results of the resistance test imply that the low suppression rate we found cannot be attributed to primary drug resistance to NVP nor to LPV/r [ 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors would be essential to consider in the scale-up of POC VL testing but are also applicable to centralized VL testing. For example, patients/caregivers in our study reported 200 Kenyan Shillings (approximately $1.85) or less, admittedly only a fraction of the estimated $25 to $30 cost per test, to be a reasonable expense they would be willing to pay out-of-pocket for POC VL testing [ 21 , 22 ]. The fact that patients/caregivers were willing to pay money for the possibility of receiving results sooner signals the value of POC VL testing to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Opt4Kids was an open-label trial that examined the impact of POC VL testing in combination with targeted drug resistance (DRM) testing and clinical decision guidance on VS among children living with HIV (CLHIV) on ART [ 22 , 28 ]. The study recruited 704 children aged 1–14 years in five high-volume HIV treatment centers in Kisumu, Kenya, and followed them for the next 12 months.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, 2 point-of-care assays have been approved as accurate by the WHO for use in LMICs 13,14 and have been evaluated in our setting. 15,16 Clinical trials of these assays among children, 17 adolescents, 18 and adults [19][20][21] have demonstrated shorter turnaround times, but effects on clinical outcomes have been mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%