2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08593-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“After viral load testing, I get my results so I get to know which path my life is taking me”: qualitative insights on routine centralized and point-of-care viral load testing in western Kenya from the Opt4Kids and Opt4Mamas studies

Abstract: Background Viral suppression (VS) is a marker of effective HIV therapy, and viral load (VL) testing is critical for treatment monitoring, especially in high-risk groups such as children and pregnant/postpartum women. Although routine VL testing, via centralized laboratory networks, was implemented in Kenya starting in 2014, optimization and sustainable scale up of VL testing are still needed. Methods We conducted a mixed methods study to evaluate t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By having closer POC DRT facilities to the spoke facilities than the national laboratory, this issue of batching delay is overcome by a network that includes POC DRT hubs. Since direct data about the impact of POC DRT testing on results utilisation have not been studied, parallels with POC VL testing may be useful: although POC VL testing has not necessarily consistently improved viral suppression,21 46–48 improved turnaround times are highly motivating for providers and patients49 and result utilisation appears to improve as well 20 47 50…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By having closer POC DRT facilities to the spoke facilities than the national laboratory, this issue of batching delay is overcome by a network that includes POC DRT hubs. Since direct data about the impact of POC DRT testing on results utilisation have not been studied, parallels with POC VL testing may be useful: although POC VL testing has not necessarily consistently improved viral suppression,21 46–48 improved turnaround times are highly motivating for providers and patients49 and result utilisation appears to improve as well 20 47 50…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study that combined POC VL with a differentiated service delivery strategy resulted in enhanced VS by 10.3% and retention by 7.7% among South African adults living with HIV [26]. Ultimately, despite some studies showing no efficacy, enthusiasm for POC VL testing exists not only among patients and providers, but also among policymakers at the national and international levels [18,32,40]. Future research needs to help elucidate cost-effective ways for when best to For intervention group participants, POC VL testing was intended to be performed at each study visit, which were targeted for every 12 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview guides covered the following domains: (1) barriers and facilitators to ART usage and VS, (2) VL literacy and experiences with SOC VL and DRM testing in regular care, (3) experiences with POC VL and DRM testing within the study, and (4) how to scale up both SOC and POC DRM and VL testing for programmatic use. For this analysis we focused on DRM testing aspects of the KIIs; for findings relevant to VL testing, please reference a related publication [ 25 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%