2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.122002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-of-care cancer diagnostic devices: From academic research to clinical translation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 167 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large majority of current medical diagnostic strategies target protein biomarkers [5–7] and are based on the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [8] . However, despite its high sensitivity, this assay possesses significant drawbacks that limit its use in point‐of‐care settings, such as high production costs, complex procedures, and the need for trained operators [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The large majority of current medical diagnostic strategies target protein biomarkers [5–7] and are based on the enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [8] . However, despite its high sensitivity, this assay possesses significant drawbacks that limit its use in point‐of‐care settings, such as high production costs, complex procedures, and the need for trained operators [9] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] In this context, the use of biosensors to detect minute amount of cancer biomarkers in biological fluids appears as a promising strategy for the early diagnosis of cancer. [5] The large majority of current medical diagnostic strategies target protein biomarkers [5][6][7] and are based on the enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). [8] However, despite its high sensitivity, this assay possesses significant drawbacks that limit its use in point-of-care settings, such as high production costs, complex procedures, and the need for trained operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a research tool, microfluidic plays a vital role in biochemical analysis (H. Lee et al, 2014; Li et al, 2014; Temmerman et al, 2004), which can be used for subsequent clinical diagnosis, nucleic acid detection, and protein analysis. Various microfluidic devices (Nguyen et al, 2019; Song et al, 2021; Syedmoradi et al, 2021) have been developed for other point‐of‐care testing (POCT). Seung et al proposed a centrifugal integrated microfluidic chip for detecting a variety of foodborne bacteria by color LAMP (Oh & Seo, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, various portable devices based on completely different signal principles, such as thermometers, barometers, , pH meters, , and portable microfluidic devices, have aroused great interest in the quantitative detection of cancer cells. Especially in the development of convenient, rapid, and point-of-care detection techniques for cancer cells, portable analysis may become an attractive and promising candidate due to its convenient operation, rapid use, low cost, and capability of on-site testing for more convenient patient monitoring and management. With an aim toward portable detection, gas pressure-based bioassays have been successfully used for the detection of cancer cells and protein biomarkers by a pressure meter as a readout. Also, a thermal-based detection method has been used for the sensitive detection of cancer cells, small molecules, and some biomarkers , by a conventional thermometer as a signal readout.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%