2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point Mutations in Protein Globular Domains: Contributions from Function, Stability and Misfolding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
5
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 and Methods). For simplicity, we assume that the probability distribution W is the same for all proteins, because it is a statistical property directly following from the physics of interactions among amino acid residues in the protein structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 and Methods). For simplicity, we assume that the probability distribution W is the same for all proteins, because it is a statistical property directly following from the physics of interactions among amino acid residues in the protein structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of the data on point mutations available in the ProTherm database (18) and in ref. 13 gives h ϭ 1(kcal/mol); D Ϸ 3(kcal/mol) 2 (see Methods and SI Text). In the diffusion approximation, Eqs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we find that nearly half [44% (1139 of 2615); Dataset S1] of the variants annotated in the PMD as functionally neutral and evaluated for structural changes have been shown by experiments cited in the PMD to affect protein structure/stability. Because structural disturbance often changes function (16), these, and likely other, annotations of functional neutrality require deeper exploration. Moreover, the shape and position of the PMDneutral distribution suggests a set of weakly disruptive variants, closer to the PMDmilds (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned, active sites are flexible, primed for substrate recognition and rate enhancement, and so sacrifice the stability ethos of the remaining protein scaffold (44,45). Mutations such as F283L, introducing greater flexibility within this region, may destabilize the enzyme by increasing active site strain or loss of favorable interactions (42) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%