2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705366104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein stability imposes limits on organism complexity and speed of molecular evolution

Abstract: Classical population genetics a priori assigns fitness to alleles without considering molecular or functional properties of proteins that these alleles encode. Here we study population dynamics in a model where fitness can be inferred from physical properties of proteins under a physiological assumption that loss of stability of any protein encoded by an essential gene confers a lethal phenotype. Accumulation of mutations in organisms containing ⌫ genes can then be represented as diffusion within the ⌫-dimensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
324
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(354 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
28
324
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the high stability of the M␤L fold (30) compared with that of serine enzymes (15,16) allows the selection of resistance mutations at the expense of the protein stability. This work also favors the hypothesis put forward by Bloom and coworkers that protein stability promotes evolvability (29) toward other opposite proposals (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Thus, the high stability of the M␤L fold (30) compared with that of serine enzymes (15,16) allows the selection of resistance mutations at the expense of the protein stability. This work also favors the hypothesis put forward by Bloom and coworkers that protein stability promotes evolvability (29) toward other opposite proposals (31).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…S2A. Likewise, in the absence of selection substitutions are more often destabilizing than stabilizing (binomial test, P < 10 −15 ), as expected from empirical studies on the effects of random mutations (61,72,75,76,80).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Random mutations in a protein-coding sequence typically destabilize the protein structure (26,72,(75)(76)(77)(78)(79)(80). Thus, if protein evolution proceeded solely via random substitutions, without any selection, we would expect a decrease in protein stability over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, increased protein stability is often accompanied by a trade-off in terms of catalytic activity (Somero 1995), although this appears not to be the case for many inferred ancestral enzymes. From an evolutionary perspective, assuming that the increased thermostability of ancestral proteins is not the result of a bias in the in silico reconstruction method (Williams et al 2006; see ''Result and Discussion'' section), the marginal stability of contemporary proteins may imply that an unknown selection pressure has caused the stability of proteins to decrease during evolution, or simply that stability is a neutral trait (Bloom et al 2007;Taverna and Goldstein 2002;Zeldovich et al 2007). For example, as the majority of mutations are destabilising rather than stabilising, it has been argued that proteins only retain high stability if it is evolutionarily beneficial (Taverna and Goldstein 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%