2007
DOI: 10.1784/insi.2007.49.7.409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PoD curves, their derivation, applications and limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
78
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used function is a cumulative log-normal distribution function [8]. A typical POD curve, as observed in previous work, is shown in Figure 3(a).…”
Section: Generation Of Pod Curvementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The most commonly used function is a cumulative log-normal distribution function [8]. A typical POD curve, as observed in previous work, is shown in Figure 3(a).…”
Section: Generation Of Pod Curvementioning
confidence: 87%
“…The POD for various crack lengths was calculated for the lab environment based on the hit-or-miss concept [33] as the ratio of the number of successful detections of a particular crack length over the total number of tests. These POD values are for discrete crack lengths.…”
Section: Probability Of Detection (Pod)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These POD values are for discrete crack lengths. In order to obtain a continuous POD curve, the POD was estimated by a logistic function for this data [33]. The cumulative distribution function of the log-logistic distribution is:…”
Section: Probability Of Detection (Pod)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of probability of detection (POD) curves for characterizing the SHM systems is recommended, which is defined as a statistical metric, widely employed in the NDT community. This requires a large number of inspection tasks for characterizing various configurations of damage that can potentially appear in the structure [17,18,19]. Many works have been done to extend this concept to SHM [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,19,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%