2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pneumatic non-contact roughness assessment of moving surfaces

Abstract: All machined surfaces inherently have roughness. The level of control of this surface is dependeat on the specifications outlined for its intended use. In strictly controlled situatiom, the monitoring and characterization of these surfaces becomes increasingly important to ensure that each component conforms to specifications. For this reason, the need f,)r in-situ monitoring systems has increased in order to optimize manufacturing time and minimize generated scrap for companies to remain competitive in indust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The tip-to-sample distance in EFM is on the order of 100 nm during the scanning, which is more than ten times larger than that in a scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) [236] [82] and is large enough to avoid collision of the tip with the sample surface. In addition, pneumatic sensors [83] and ultrasonic sensors [213] are other types of noncontact sensors for on-machine surface metrology.…”
Section: Noncontact-type Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tip-to-sample distance in EFM is on the order of 100 nm during the scanning, which is more than ten times larger than that in a scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) [236] [82] and is large enough to avoid collision of the tip with the sample surface. In addition, pneumatic sensors [83] and ultrasonic sensors [213] are other types of noncontact sensors for on-machine surface metrology.…”
Section: Noncontact-type Probesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Przykładowo, omawiając pneumatyczną metodę pomiaru chropowatości (rys. 1) autorzy pomijają analizę błędów dynamicznych zaznaczając, że ich wartość została określona na podstawie geometrii czujnika [18]. [18].…”
Section: Określanie Właściwości Dynamicznych Czujników Pneumatycznychunclassified
“…Some research has aimed tried to reduce the probing force to several mN [4,5], but high measurable depth and high precision cannot be achieved at the same time. Noncontact probing methods are promising solutions to this challenge [6][7][8]. Of all the noncontact probing methods, optical methods are more promising to obtain higher resolution and precision [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%