2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2011.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plural form franchise networks: A test of Bradach’s model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several franchising researchers (e.g. Cliquet and Pénard 2012;Sorenson and Sørensen 2001) pointed out that franchisees may be more inclined than company managers to engage in local adaptation, which may imply that franchisees are more inclined than company managers to actively engage in knowledge sharing and networking behaviours. In a similar vein, multi-unit franchisees may behave differently from single-unit franchisees due to different strategic orientations and a larger scale of activities (Grünhagen and Mittelsteadt 2005;Dant et al 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several franchising researchers (e.g. Cliquet and Pénard 2012;Sorenson and Sørensen 2001) pointed out that franchisees may be more inclined than company managers to engage in local adaptation, which may imply that franchisees are more inclined than company managers to actively engage in knowledge sharing and networking behaviours. In a similar vein, multi-unit franchisees may behave differently from single-unit franchisees due to different strategic orientations and a larger scale of activities (Grünhagen and Mittelsteadt 2005;Dant et al 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bradach's central argument is that by using the plural form-a mix of company-owned units and franchised units-chain management is more likely to meet four primary challenges in franchising (Bradach 1997(Bradach , 1998: growth, uniformity, local responsiveness and system-wide adaptation. This plural form argument has led to an extensive body of literature (e.g., Botti, Briec, and Cliquet 2009;Cliquet and Penard 2012;Dant, Perrigot, and Cliquet 2008;Perrigot and Herrbach 2012;Perryman and Combs 2012), sometimes going beyond the field of franchising research-see, for example, Heide's (2003) study on the plural form phenomenon in the context of industrial purchasing. Bradach (1998) observed that former employees as well as MU franchisees tend to replicate the management structures observed in the company arrangement in terms of control, performance evaluation systems and operations reporting schemes.…”
Section: Multiunit Franchising As Hierarchymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interdependence of franchisor and franchisee creates the need for an organizational arrangement, the plural-formed franchise system, which consists of both corporate-owned units and franchised units (Bradach, 1997;Michael, 2000;Kidwell and Nygaard, 2011;Cliquet and Penard, 2012;Perryman and Combs, 2012). The international expansion and success of such systems strongly depends on strategies that safeguard brand names against channel member shirking and free riding, forms of withholding effort that can be defined as an undersupply of quality in interfirm relationships (Wathne and Heide, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%