2018
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleurectomy/decortication versus extrapleural pneumonectomy: a critical choice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore recommend that all patients scheduled for MCR undergo a preoperative assessment by spirometry and V/Q-scan to predict postoperative FEV1 and determine whether the healthy lung offers sufficient quality and functional reserve to tolerate an EPP (27). Our present data confirm that despite recent trends towards EPD, EPP performed in an experienced center may still offer a reasonable approach in selected cases with large tumor burden and extensive involvement of the lung parenchyma, but good functional reserve of the nonaffected lung (6,10,42,43). As a single-center study it needs to be highlighted, that external validity may be limited and the findings may not be generalizable.…”
Section: Outcomesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We therefore recommend that all patients scheduled for MCR undergo a preoperative assessment by spirometry and V/Q-scan to predict postoperative FEV1 and determine whether the healthy lung offers sufficient quality and functional reserve to tolerate an EPP (27). Our present data confirm that despite recent trends towards EPD, EPP performed in an experienced center may still offer a reasonable approach in selected cases with large tumor burden and extensive involvement of the lung parenchyma, but good functional reserve of the nonaffected lung (6,10,42,43). As a single-center study it needs to be highlighted, that external validity may be limited and the findings may not be generalizable.…”
Section: Outcomesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In selected patients (good performance status and early-stage disease), “radical surgical procedures” have been offered in the past, with or without different induction/adjuvant treatments [ 4 ]. In 1996, Sugarbaker et al have published a large series of MPM patients treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) with a 5-year survival rate upper than 30% [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While P/D spares the lung by removing only parietal and/or visceral pleura, EPP is the resection of the lung, parietal pleura, pericardium, and diaphragm. It has been reported that EPP is associated with higher perioperative mortality, lower quality of life, and lower tolerance in adjuvant chemotherapy compared to P/D [55]. However, the recurrence rate of EPP is two times lower than P/D [55], and the 5-year survival rate is not significantly different between the two [56].…”
Section: Malignant Pleural Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It has been reported that EPP is associated with higher perioperative mortality, lower quality of life, and lower tolerance in adjuvant chemotherapy compared to P/D [55]. However, the recurrence rate of EPP is two times lower than P/D [55], and the 5-year survival rate is not significantly different between the two [56]. For many years, P/D has been conducted in early stages to save the lung.…”
Section: Malignant Pleural Mesotheliomamentioning
confidence: 99%