Platform-mediated tourism micro-entrepreneurship: implications for community-based tourism in Thailand

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to bridge micro-entrepreneurship, sharing economy and community-based tourism (CBT) literature by analyzing the specific ways in which technological platforms mitigate risks and create opportunities that benefit local communities. Design/methodology/approach Six online platforms (two local and four international) used by tourism micro-entrepreneurs in Thailand were systematically analyzed to compare and contrast nuances in their business models, as well as their features to highlight benefits to CBT. Thematic analysis was used in the data analysis. Findings Three different types of business models based on tourism offers, membership policy and contributions to the destination community were identified. The variety of tourism offers includes tailor-made tours and private tour guides, local food experiences, skilled workshops and other local/community-based activities. Importantly, Thai platforms work closely with the Thai Government to promote tourism micro-entrepreneurship. Originality/value This paper adds to tourism micro-entrepreneurship, sharing economy and CBT literature by dissecting the business models of online platforms and their roles as mediators of CBT, discussing the platforms’ contributions to the achievement of sustainable development goals.

Yurt Invited: Combining Tourists and Stakeholders Perceptions of Sustainable Community-Based Tourism in Central Asia

“…These results show that both tourists' and stakeholders' perceptions of CBT coincide in that there is scope for more compelling actions toward sustainability. That is, the sustainability performance of CBT in Central Asian countries can be improved beyond the current practices in managing environmental, social, and financial issues [109]. On the one hand, stakeholders pointed out that there is need to work on improving environmental preservation, reducing socioeconomic impacts on the local populations, building human capital, enabling local entrepreneurship, and providing local financial facilities.…”

A gap analysis of farm tourism microentrepreneurial mentoring needs in North Carolina, USA

“…Often, these solutions take the form of web marketplaces where microentrepreneurs can offer their services to potential customers. Marketplaces such as Airbnb, HipCamp, and Harvest Host allow suppliers to showcase their goods or services and help potential customers navigate offerings (Ditta-Apichai et al, 2020;Ferreira et al, 2015).…”

“…This is matched by a growing demand for authentic, unscripted experiences by hyperconnected urbanites and fueled by the current mushrooming of the tourism sharing economy (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD], 2016) and web platforms like Airbnb, HipCamp, and HarvestHost. Tourism microentrepreneurs who provide experiences, food, lodging, or transportation now have the ability to bypass retail monopolies and mitigate information imbalances by making their services and products directly available to potential visitors (Ditta-Apichai, Kattiyapornpong, & Gretzel, 2020). However, there are concerns that the advent of web-based sharing economy platforms may be widening the socio-economic gap between individuals across the digital divide by excluding microentrepreneurs with unreliable access to the internet and limited computer skills (Morais et al, 2012;Payton, Morais & Heath, 2015).…”

Three-Way Interaction Effect Model: Moderating Effect of Resource Between Business Age and Host Performance

“…Against the backdrop, this study explored the accommodation sharing from the perspective of micro-entrepreneurship. Tourism micro-entrepreneurship is small-scale, informal tourism businesses with fewer owners/managers/worker ( Ferreira et al, 2015 ; Ditta-Apichai et al, 2020 ). In this perspective, each host is all operating a micro-enterprise.…”