2010
DOI: 10.1002/jor.21152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet‐rich plasma on calcium phosphate granules promotes metaphyseal bone healing in mini‐pigs

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The role of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a promoter of bone healing remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of PRP in combination with calcium phosphate granules (CPG) on bone defect healing in a metaphyseal long bone defect. A metaphyseal bone defect at the proximal tibia of 16 mini-pigs was filled with CPG combined with autologous PRP or CPG solely (control group). The PRP showed 4.4-fold more platelets compared to peripheral blood. Six weeks after surgery the rad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[26][27][28][29][30] A large animal model also allows the study of specific areas of the DO wound. Minipigs are cooperative and relatively easy to work with during the experimental manipulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29][30] A large animal model also allows the study of specific areas of the DO wound. Minipigs are cooperative and relatively easy to work with during the experimental manipulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently there have been conflicting reports about the effect of PRP plasma, and there is no consensus regarding the role of PRP in bone regeneration: there are multiple favorable results of PRP regarding the improvement of proliferation of MSC in vitro and in vivo after ectopic implantation, but also in animal models with critical-size bone defects [Kasten et al, 2008b;Bi et al, 2010;Hakimi et al, 2010;Hartmann et al, 2010;Jungbluth et al, 2010;Niemeyer et al, 2010;Bae et al, 2011;Liu et al, 2011]. However, there is also a relevant number of studies reporting no or minimal effects of PRP on bone formation [Li et al, 2004;Roldan et al, 2004;Plachokova et al, 2007;Thor et al, 2007;Vasconcelos Gurgel et al, 2007;You et al, 2007;Miloro et al, 2010;Kazakos et al, 2011].…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Besides the aforementioned animals, minipig is a recommended large animal model for pre-clinical evaluation of human orthopedic implants [35], and has been employed to assess bone repair at different sites including tibia [36], calvaria [37], mandible [38] and cartilage [39,40]. Yet these studies focused on the evaluation of cells, scaffold materials and growth factors, alone or in combination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%