“…[ 28 ] n = 80 (50 m, 30 f); alopecia areata (AA) | Comparison: cryotherapy versus MN | Group 1: cryotherapy Group 2: MN | MN automated pen, 1.00–2.00 mm needles, session endpoints marked as 4–5 passes longitudinally, vertically, and diagonally | 6, once every 2 weeks | 12 weeks | Hair counts, hair density, Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores, photographic evaluation, self assessments | Yes Hair counts, hair density, SALT scores, photographic evaluation, and self assessments improved in groups 1 and 2; higher changes to SALT scores in group 2 versus 1 | No adverse events in group 2 | 3 | Ragab et al. [ 29 ] | n = 60 (48 m, 12 f); AA | Combination: PRP solution | Group 1: PRP injections Group 2: fractional CO 2 laser + PRP topical Group 3: MN + PRP topical | MN roller, 1.50 mm needles, session endpoints marked as 4–5 passes longitudinally, vertically, and obliquely until mild erythema noted | 3, once monthly | 3 months | SALT | Yes SALT scores improved in groups 1, 2, and 3; no difference in SALT scores across groups | No serious events reported; pain higher in group 1 versus group 3 | 3 |
Abdallah et al. [ 30 ] | n = 20 (19 m, 1 f); AA | Intrapatient comparison: triamcinolone acetonide injections, minoxidil 5% injections | Patch 1: triamcinolone acetonide injections Patch 2: 5% minoxidil injections Patch 3: triamcinolone acetonide injections + 5% minoxidil injections Patch 4: MN Patch 5: control | MN roller, session endpoints marked as 4–5 passes longitudinally, vertically, and diagonally | 4, once every 4 weeks | 16 weeks | SALT, Lesional Area & Density (LAD) scores | Yes SALT and LAD scores decreased in patches 1, 2, 3, and 4; largest differences seen in patches 1 and 3 versus patch 5 | No serious events reported | 2 |
Giorgio et al. |
…”