2020
DOI: 10.18053/jctres.06.202001.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet/ lymphocyte ratio for prediction of no reflow phenomenon in ST elevation myocardial infarction managed with primary percutanous coronary intervention

Abstract: Background: Coronary no-reflow phenomenon in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a poor clinical outcome. Although its pathophysiology is not fully understood, a deregulated systemic inflammatory response plays an important role. We aimed to explore the relationship between platelet\lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and no-reflow in patients with acute STEMI who were treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods: A tota… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4 , 36 - 38 Indeed, several studies pertaining to cardiovascular reperfusion show a strong association of elevated PLR with the no-reflow phenomenon. 7 , 8 This may explain our observation that lower PLR levels collected at delayed timepoints were associated with good functional outcomes and higher delayed PLR levels with mortality in studies included in the systematic review, but admission PLR showed nonsignificant results in each of the treatment subgroups, as all included patients received RT and hence these phenomena may have occurred. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the publication bias detected in the delayed timepoints analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 4 , 36 - 38 Indeed, several studies pertaining to cardiovascular reperfusion show a strong association of elevated PLR with the no-reflow phenomenon. 7 , 8 This may explain our observation that lower PLR levels collected at delayed timepoints were associated with good functional outcomes and higher delayed PLR levels with mortality in studies included in the systematic review, but admission PLR showed nonsignificant results in each of the treatment subgroups, as all included patients received RT and hence these phenomena may have occurred. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the publication bias detected in the delayed timepoints analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 4 The platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is such a biomarker that has shown utility in emergency medicine and trauma settings, 5 acute illnesses such as acute coronary syndrome, 6 and cardiovascular reperfusion. 7 , 8 It is particularly promising as it could potentially provide insight into both inflammation and thrombotic/hemostatic mechanisms thought to play a role in AIS pathogenesis, whereas other biomarkers shown to have prognostic value such as C-Reactive Protein, platelet count and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio encompass only one of these mechanisms. 4 , 9 - 11 While there has been some evidence showing benefit of PLR in predicting clinical outcomes, 12 - 19 mortality 12 , 16 , 17 , 19 - 21 and bleeding risk 12 , 17 , 18 , 22 , 23 in AIS patients treated with reperfusion therapy (RT), this is yet to be clearly elucidated; to the best of our knowledge there is no systematic review or meta-analysis currently in the literature evaluating this.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLR was considerably greater in the no-reflow group compared to the group with normal reflow in a total of 200 patients with STEMI who had pPCI. No-reflow was detected in 29% of these patients [ 41 ]. Similar to this, Enöz O. et al claim that PLR is a widely accessible inflammatory biomarker that may be used to predict the no-reflow event after thrombus aspiration during PCI in patients with STEMI [ 42 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High levels were independent predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon and intracoronary thrombus burden [ 41 , 42 , 43 ].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%