Platelet and immune responses to oral cyclic dexamethasone therapy in childhood chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura

Self Cite

1,836

1,954

IntroductionPrimary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired immunemediated disorder characterized by isolated thrombocytopenia, defined as a peripheral blood platelet count less than 100 ϫ 10 9 /L, and the absence of any obvious initiating and/or underlying cause of the thrombocytopenia. 1 Until recently, the abbreviation ITP stood for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, but current awareness relating to the immune-mediated nature of the disease, and the absence or minimal signs of bleeding in a large proportion of cases have led to a revision of the terminology. 1 Concepts surrounding the mechanisms of thrombocytopenia in ITP have shifted from the traditional view of increased platelet destruction mediated by autoantibodies to more complex mechanisms in which both impaired platelet production and T cell-mediated effects play a role. [2][3][4][5][6] Recent epidemiologic data suggest that the incidence in adults is approximately equal for the sexes except in the mid-adult years (30-60 years), when the disease is more prevalent in women. 7,8 ITP is classified by duration into newly diagnosed, persistent (3-12 months' duration) and chronic (Ն 12 months' duration). 1 Whereas ITP in adults typically has an insidious onset with no preceding viral or other illness and it normally follows a chronic course, 9 ITP in children is usually short-lived with at least two-thirds recovering spontaneously within 6 months. 10 Signs and symptoms vary widely. Many patients have either no symptoms or minimal bruising, whereas others experience serious bleeding, which may include gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GI), extensive skin and mucosal hemorrhage, or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). The severity of thrombocytopenia correlates to some extent but not completely with the bleeding risk. 7,11 Additional factors (eg, age, lifestyle factors, uremia) affect the risk and should be evaluated before the appropriate management is determined.The investigation and management of ITP patients vary widely. The purpose of this consensus document is to comment on new data and provide recommendations relating to diagnosis and treatment. Final judgment regarding care of individual patients should, however, lie with the responsible health care professional and be based on careful investigation of individual circumstances. MethodsComposition of the panel. The panel included 22 members with recognized clinical and research expertise in ITP representing North America (United States, 7; Canada, 1), Europe (France, 1; Italy, 2; Spain, 1; Switzerland, 1; United Kingdom, 8), and Australia (1).Assessment of the literature. Articles were identified by a computer-assisted search of the literature published in English using the National Library of Medicine PubMed database. The For personal use only. on May 7, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org From search criteria were: 'immune thrombocytopenic purpura', 'idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura', 'ITP', and 'autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura'. A subsequent search was performed using the corresponding MedLin...

Section: Treatment Options For Children With Persistent or Chronic Itpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Treatment Options For Children With Persistent or Chronic Itpmentioning

confidence: 99%

International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia

Provan¹,

Stasi

Newland³

et al. 2010

Self Cite

1,836

1,954

“…43 Small prospective observational studies yield similar results with frequent adverse events. [44][45][46][47] The 1996 ASH guideline noted that numerous agents such as azathioprine, danazol, and interferon have been used in a small number of children and adolescents with chronic or persistent ITP who failed to respond to more conventional therapy. Although the list of such agents has expanded and now includes mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, and others, data for any single agent, with the possible exception of dapsone, or combination of agents remain insufficient for specific recommendations.…”

Section: 3b We Suggestmentioning

confidence: 99%

The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia

Neunert

Lim

Crowther

et al. 2011

1,650

1,783

Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. In 1996 the American Society of Hematology published a landmark guidance paper designed to assist clinicians in the management of this disorder. Since 1996 there have been numerous advances in the management of both adult and pediatric ITP. These changes mandated an update in the guidelines. This guideline uses a rigorous, evidence-based approach to the location, interpretation, and presentation of the available evidence. We have endeavored to identify, abstract, and present all available methodologically rigorous data informing the treatment of ITP. We provide evidence-based treatment recommendations using the GRADE system in those areas in which such evidence exists. We do not provide evidence in those areas in which evidence is lacking, or is of lower quality-interested readers are referred to a number of recent, consensus-based recommendations for expert opinion in these clinical areas. Our review identified the need for additional studies in many key areas of the therapy of ITP such as comparative studies of "front-line" therapy for ITP, the management of serious bleeding in patients with ITP, and studies that will provide guidance about which therapy should be used as salvage therapy for patients after failure of a first-line intervention. (Blood. 2011;117(16):4190-4207)

“…Indeed, in a small cohort of patients a response rate of 100% has been observed, 15 but in other studies, the same approach was not so successful. [16][17][18][19] Andersen's purpose 15 was based mainly on some considerations: (1) efficacy of pulsed corticosteroids in reducing immunoglobulin production in clonal B-cell disorders; (2) long half-life and good tolerability of DXM when given in high doses; and (3) very low cost of corticosteroids. Moreover, the efficacy associated with acceptable tolerability of pulsed HD-DXM was previously reported in the treatment of multiple myeloma.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Therapy with high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) in previously untreated patients affected by idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a GIMEMA experience

Mazzucconi

Fazi

Bernasconi

et al. 2006

232

181

In idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), corticosteroids have been widely recognized as the most appropriate firstline treatment, even if the best therapeutic approach is still a matter of debate. Recently, a single high-dose dexamethasone (HD-DXM) course was administered as first-line therapy in adult patients with ITP. In this paper we show the results of 2 prospective pilot studies (monocentric and multicentric, respectively) concerning the use of repeated pulses of HD-DXM in untreated ITP patients. In the monocenter study, 37 patients with severe ITP, age at least 20 years and no more than 65 years, were enrolled. HD-DXM was given in 4-day pulses every 28 days, for 6 cycles. Response rate was 89.2%; relapse-free survival (RFS) was 90% at 15 months; long-term responses, lasting for a median time of 26 months (range 6-77 months) were 25 of 37 (67.6%). In the multicenter study, 95 patients with severe ITP, age at least 2 years and no more than 70 years, were enrolled. HD-DXM was given in 4-day pulses every 14 days, for 4 cycles; 90 patients completed 4 cycles. Response rate (85.6%) was similar in patients classified by age (< 18 years, 36 of 42 ‫؍‬ 85.7%; > 18 years, 41 of 48 ‫؍‬ 85.4%, P ‫؍‬ not significant), with a statistically significant difference between the second and third cycle (75.8% vs 89%, P ‫؍‬ .018). RFS at 15 months 81%; long-term responses, lasting for a median time of 8 months (range 4-24 months) were 67 of 90 (74.4%). In both studies, therapy was well tolerated. A schedule of 3 cycles of HD-DXM pulses will be compared with standard prednisone therapy (eg, 1 mg/kg per day) in the next randomized Gruppo Italiano Malattie EMatologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA) trial. (Blood.