2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.594272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastid Phylogenomics of Dendroseris (Cichorieae; Asteraceae): Insights Into Structural Organization and Molecular Evolution of an Endemic Lineage From the Juan Fernández Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, Kim et al [30] compared 21 Artemisia (32 accessions) and suggested the markers accD and ycf1 may represent the potential markers to be tested for the whole Asteraceae. Recognition of these two markers seem to be line with several other studies on the genera in Asteraceae, where either one of both markers were observed in the suggestion list [31,32]. The marker ycf1 is included among the 19 divergent hotspots although it possesses a lower nucleotide diversity (Pi = 0.0004), imply the potential application of these markers over all species of Asteraceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, Kim et al [30] compared 21 Artemisia (32 accessions) and suggested the markers accD and ycf1 may represent the potential markers to be tested for the whole Asteraceae. Recognition of these two markers seem to be line with several other studies on the genera in Asteraceae, where either one of both markers were observed in the suggestion list [31,32]. The marker ycf1 is included among the 19 divergent hotspots although it possesses a lower nucleotide diversity (Pi = 0.0004), imply the potential application of these markers over all species of Asteraceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Overall, narrow nucleotide diversities for C. chinense are observed (Table 2), likely because of comparative analyses was made within species that sampling differently from two localities. The highly divergent hotspots usually are identi ed between closer species [30,31,32]. Furthermore, the chloroplast genomes of same species were relatively conserved, exhibited in less remarkable polymorphism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We, therefore, also restricted our use of the plastome to the protein-coding CDS and refrained from attempting to use the entire plastome, thus also including non-coding regions, for the phylogenetic analysis. This restriction must be seen as critical in the light of recently reported gene tree conflicts in phylogenies based on plastome data (e.g., Gonçalves et al, 2019 ; Walker et al, 2019 ; Cho et al, 2020 ; Köhler et al, 2020 ), which questions the assumption of the plastome as a single locus. Cho et al (2020) recovered different topologies for deep branches in Sonchus comparing phylogenetic reconstruction based on the protein-coding CDS only, with one based on the entire plastome, and Köhler et al (2020) even recorded conflicting topologies among major clades of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae), when exploring different assemblies of top-informative CDS markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This restriction must be seen as critical in the light of recently reported gene tree conflicts in phylogenies based on plastome data (e.g., Gonçalves et al, 2019 ; Walker et al, 2019 ; Cho et al, 2020 ; Köhler et al, 2020 ), which questions the assumption of the plastome as a single locus. Cho et al (2020) recovered different topologies for deep branches in Sonchus comparing phylogenetic reconstruction based on the protein-coding CDS only, with one based on the entire plastome, and Köhler et al (2020) even recorded conflicting topologies among major clades of Opuntioideae (Cactaceae), when exploring different assemblies of top-informative CDS markers. However, it cannot in all cases be excluded so far that non-biological causes are responsible for such conflicts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cladogenetic speciation is generally known to involve an initial immigrant population splitting into morphologically and ecologically distinct evolutionary lineages through adaptation to divergent habitats on the island, resulting in two or more new species being recognized taxonomically. There are numerous examples of this speciation mode, including the Lobelia complex (Campanulaceae) ( Givnish et al, 2009 ) and the silversword alliance ( Carlquist et al, 2003 ) in Hawaii; Scalesia (Asteraceae) in the Gálapagos Islands ( Eliasson, 1974 ; Schilling et al, 1994 ; Fernández-Mazuecos et al, 2020 ); Echium (Boraginaceae) ( Böhle et al, 1996 ; Garcıa-Maroto et al, 2009 ), Aeonium (Crassulaceae) ( Jorgensen and Olesen, 2001 ; Mort et al, 2002 ), and the woody Sonchus alliance (Asteraceae) ( Kim et al, 1996a , b , 2008 ; Santiago and Kim, 2009 ) in the Canary Islands; and Dendroseris and Robinsonia (Asteraceae) in the Juan Fernández Islands ( Crawford et al, 1998 ; Cho et al, 2020 ). In addition to the adaptive radiation in heterogeneous habitats, examples of cladogenetic speciation triggered by non-adaptive radiation have been also presented, such as Nigella arvensis complex (Ranunculaceae) in the Aegean Archipelago ( Comes et al, 2008 ; Jaros et al, 2018 ) and Helianthemum (Cistaceae) in the Canary Islands ( Albaladejo et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%