Plasticity of barley in response to plant neighbors in cultivar mixtures

Abstract

Aims Cultivar mixtures can increase productivity through complementarity in resource use, but reported results are often conflicting and the role of plasticity in shaping plant-plant interactions is poorly understood. We aim to determine if individual cultivars show different phenotypic responses when grown in a mixture, whether these responses depend on the neighboring cultivar identity, and how they contribute to variations in productivity and nitrogen (N) use. Methods Five spring barley cultivars were field-grown in pure stands and in mixtures during 2 years. Plant traits related to development, growth, N use, and reproduction were measured to identify temporal patterns of plastic responses to neighboring plants. Results Plants in mixtures were shorter and developed slower early in the season, but later on they grew faster and produced more grain than the corresponding pure stands. Some cultivars showed complementary N accumulation only when grown together with specific neighbors. Mechanisms of improved productivity differed between the individual mixtures. Conclusions Plastic plant-plant interaction between cultivars is an important driver behind the variability in mixing effects. Results contribute to a better understanding of how productivity in cultivar mixtures is affected by plastic adaptation and differentiation of plant traits, depending on the environment created by neighboring genotypes.

Multifaceted functional diversity for multifaceted crop yield: Towards ecological assembly rules for varietal mixtures

“…In crops, studies at the interspecific level also suggest that plastic changes in architectural traits can lead to increased light capture and productivity in intercropping systems (Zhu, Werf, Anten, Vos, & Evers, 2015). At the intraspecific level, plasticity has been shown to have both positive and negative effects on mixture performance (Dahlin, Kiaer, Bergkvist, Weih, & Ninkovic, 2020).…”

Interpreting Diachronic Size Variation in Prehistoric Central Asian Cereal Grains

“…Environmental conditions, including water availability and nutrients, directly influence the grain morphology in cereals (Giles, 1990;Blum, 1996Blum, , 2005Knüpffer et al, 2003;Shah and Paulsen, 2003;Fuller et al, 2017;Motuzaite Matuzeviciute et al, 2018). Most crop plants express extreme developmental responses to factors, such as insufficient water supply or nutrients, through stunted growth and reduced yields, but unless the stress is extreme, the plant will not die (Bradshaw, 1965;Lacaze et al, 2009;Dahlin et al, 2020). Suboptimal growing conditions for cereal crops can result in smaller seeds (Seghatoleslami et al, 2008).…”

“…Likewise, experimental studies in rain-fed fields in northern Spain illustrated that barley grain weight was affected not only by drought stress but also by high temperature during the grain filling period; moreover, a plant might react only to one of these stresses or to both simultaneously (Voltas et al, 1999). In addition to known environmental variables such as precipitation, water availability, temperature, day length, nutrients, sunlight, altitude, and latitude, a plant's life cycle is influential for genotype responses (Voltas et al, 1999;Wiegmann et al, 2019;Dahlin et al, 2020). Smaller seed size in the early to mid-third millennium BC barley grains could have been affected by thermal and water stress at the stage of grains filling in the summer (Magliano et al, 2014).…”

“…Barley phenotypic plasticity is common as well for plant elongation (plant height and spike length) as for grain characteristics (weight and size) (Hübner et al, 2013). Barley phenotypic plasticity can vary depending on what other crops or species are cultivated on the same field (Dahlin et al, 2020).…”

How does leaf functional diversity affect the light environment in forest canopies? An in-silico biodiversity experiment

“…We concluded that this PFT richness effect on light partitioning indeed occurs mainly due to the canopyunderstory interactions. This inequality can contribute to differences in the growth-related secondary responses of different species in mixtures (Dahlin et al, 2019;Forrester et al, 2018). It can also create a positive feedback loop for diversification of some traits: e.g.…”