1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00425471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasmid control of recombination in E. coli K 12

Abstract: The recombination proficiency of three recipient strains of Escherichia coli K12 carrying different plasmids was investigated by conjugal mating with Hfr Cavalli. Some plasmids (e.g. R1drd 19, R6K) caused a marked reduction in the yield of recombinants formed in crosses with Hfr but did not reduce the ability of host strains to accept plasmid F104. The effect of plasmids on recombination was host-dependent. In Hfr crosses with AB1157 (R1-19) used as a recipient the linkage between selected and unselected proxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the observed segregations of plasmids from S. typhimuriirnz strains 993 and 16408 were due to legitimate recombination events in E. coli similar to that directed by dar in S. ryphimurium, either a plasmidencoded repressor for such recombination events effective in S. typhimurium but not in E. d i , or a difference in sensitivity of the plasmid to this function in the two species, may be postulated. There are reports which suggest that the plasmids R I -19 and R I00 code for a repressor4 ke molecule that may interact with the E. cwli gene product involved in recombination (Chernin and Ovadis, 1980). Furthermore, these plasmids are stable in E. coli and not in S. fyphirnurium, which has been attributed to the dor gene function of S .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the observed segregations of plasmids from S. typhimuriirnz strains 993 and 16408 were due to legitimate recombination events in E. coli similar to that directed by dar in S. ryphimurium, either a plasmidencoded repressor for such recombination events effective in S. typhimurium but not in E. d i , or a difference in sensitivity of the plasmid to this function in the two species, may be postulated. There are reports which suggest that the plasmids R I -19 and R I00 code for a repressor4 ke molecule that may interact with the E. cwli gene product involved in recombination (Chernin and Ovadis, 1980). Furthermore, these plasmids are stable in E. coli and not in S. fyphirnurium, which has been attributed to the dor gene function of S .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hfr 22As HB94 but containing plasmid RP4::SuAlP2+ -131G2 (10) As W3110 but containing plasmid RP4::SuA1P2+-P10G2 (10) As GM33 but containing plasmid RP4::SuAlP2+-11G02 (10) As KT01 but containing plasmid RP4::SuA1P2+-P1GP2 homologous recombination generating the Mu recombinants is similar in both E. coli and S. typhimurium recA+ strains. There are reports which suggest that R1-19 and R100 code for a repressor-like molecule that may interact with the E. coli chromosomal gene products involved in recombination (3,4). Such reports raise the possibility that the putative repressor coded by these plasmids may interact with, and repress differently, the E. coli and S. typhimurium recombination enzymes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%