2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma surface treatment of polyethylene terephthalate films for bacterial repellence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be explained by the fact that EG 3 retains interfacial water layers so that it prevents the direct contact between bacteria and surface. Moreover, in recent studies [70,71] we showed that S. epidermidis adhesion was reduced by He/O 2 plasma treated PET and this is in accordance with the Thermodynamic Theory since adhesion was observed to be negatively correlated with the free energy of adhesion ðDG adh do Þ and its polar component ðDG increases. This could be explained by the presence of hydrated layers at the He/O 2 treated surfaces and around bacteria, due to their hydrophilic-polar nature, which, during bacterial adhesion, overlap giving rise to repulsions which are commonly known as "hydrophilic repulsions" or "hydration forces" [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This may be explained by the fact that EG 3 retains interfacial water layers so that it prevents the direct contact between bacteria and surface. Moreover, in recent studies [70,71] we showed that S. epidermidis adhesion was reduced by He/O 2 plasma treated PET and this is in accordance with the Thermodynamic Theory since adhesion was observed to be negatively correlated with the free energy of adhesion ðDG adh do Þ and its polar component ðDG increases. This could be explained by the presence of hydrated layers at the He/O 2 treated surfaces and around bacteria, due to their hydrophilic-polar nature, which, during bacterial adhesion, overlap giving rise to repulsions which are commonly known as "hydrophilic repulsions" or "hydration forces" [30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Comparing the SEM images of Figure 1A and Figure 1B, it is appreciated that untreated PP nanocomposites present a smoother surface, whereas plasma treated PP/nAg shows a rougher surface. The surface of the later is rougher since plasma reactive species collide with the nanocomposite surface producing chain scission and remove polymer chains located at the most external part of the nanocomposite, generating roughness of the surface [9][10][11]. Beake et al [12] reported the surface erosion of PET films treated by plasma.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O 2 and Ar-O 2 plasmas have been successfully used for oxide films deposition [9,10], synthesis of metal oxide nanowires [11], sterilization and decontamination of medical instruments [1,12,13,14,15] and polymer surface treatment [3,16,17,18]. Furthermore, the O( 1 D) atoms present in Ar-O 2 plasma were shown to have the potential for surface activation [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%