1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00575134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma contamination with electrode metal vapor jets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ring electrode is made of Cu and exhibits an inner diameter of 20 mm. This geometry minimizes plasma instabilities related to interacting anodic and cathodic plasma jets [7,17]. As shown in figure 1(a), a Macor cap is mounted on the cylindrical electrode, limiting the interface of the latter with air to 17 mm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ring electrode is made of Cu and exhibits an inner diameter of 20 mm. This geometry minimizes plasma instabilities related to interacting anodic and cathodic plasma jets [7,17]. As shown in figure 1(a), a Macor cap is mounted on the cylindrical electrode, limiting the interface of the latter with air to 17 mm 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From 100 A to 300 A, as marked by blue dashed ellipse, almost all droplets from the tungsten-copper electrode are ejected from the anode and most reach the cathode region, providing evidence that the anode jet is stronger than the cathode jet. However, for a current of 400 A, some droplets are sputtered from cathode (see the region marked by red dashed ellipse), and more droplets from the anode have trajectories to either side of the cathode, implying that many ejected droplets move horizontally due to the interaction between the cathode jet and the anode jet [27]. Another difference from figure 8(a) is that there is no significant change in the droplet size with increasing current.…”
Section: Visualization and Mechanisms Of Splashing Erosion Of Electro...mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This maximum typically occurred within 1 ms to 2 ms of the current peak. It is possible to estimate the expansion of the electrode vapor jet from these measurements by modeling the jet as a cone with an axially varying density distribution, similar to the treatment found in [15]. This treatment, with the assumption of a radially uniform vapor pressure distribution inside the cone, yields the following expression for the expansion angle:…”
Section: B Electrode Vapor Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%