2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant variety protection in developing countries. A report from the field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This type of analysis has not been carried out in many of these countries because of inefficient time series data being available owing to the later stage at which developing countries joined the UPOV Convention. 12 Studies that have analysed changes in plant variety protection in developed countries include those done by Diez 16 , Srinivasan 17 and Pardey et al 4 These studies have analysed the trends and changes in plant variety protection policies; the effects of IPRs on plant breeding investment; production of new varieties; and market power or concentration, as well as varietal concentration ratios. Louwaars et al 18 and Tripp et al 12 conducted extensive studies on IPRs in five developing countries: China, Colombia, Kenya, Uganda and India.…”
Section: Research Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This type of analysis has not been carried out in many of these countries because of inefficient time series data being available owing to the later stage at which developing countries joined the UPOV Convention. 12 Studies that have analysed changes in plant variety protection in developed countries include those done by Diez 16 , Srinivasan 17 and Pardey et al 4 These studies have analysed the trends and changes in plant variety protection policies; the effects of IPRs on plant breeding investment; production of new varieties; and market power or concentration, as well as varietal concentration ratios. Louwaars et al 18 and Tripp et al 12 conducted extensive studies on IPRs in five developing countries: China, Colombia, Kenya, Uganda and India.…”
Section: Research Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agreement created a technical space for the granting of rights for varieties as it identified the fundamental differences that occur within species. 12 Based on this agreement, the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV) Convention developed the sui generis system in 1963 which enabled protection of new plant varieties. This form of varietal protection was referred to as 'plant breeders' rights'.…”
Section: History Of Plant Variety Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for downstream germplasm flows from breeders to farmers and among farmers, impacts have probably not been significant for small farmers to date (Tripp et al 2007). Indeed, the private sector accounted for about 20% of wheat varieties released in developing countries over the period, 1988-2002, with 50-80% of them having CIMMYT parentage.…”
Section: Trade-related Intellectual Property Rights (Trips)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are such problems in the field of agricultural intellectual properties, for example, there is a shortage of qualified operating staff, the relevant system and regulations are not fully developed, and some theories cannot be applied to practice [6]. Besides, agricultural intellectual property is slightly different with other innovation outcomes in operation due to its features, and the long profit recovery period also results in lack of motivation to transfer the outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%