2009
DOI: 10.1080/11263500902722964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant species delimitation: A comparison of morphological and molecular markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
114
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, markers independent of the environment are necessary for reliable identification and discrimination of genotypes. The superiority of molecular markers over morphological characterization in fruit species is well established and widely accepted (Ercisli et al, 2007;Zamani et al, 2007;Duminil and Di Michele, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, markers independent of the environment are necessary for reliable identification and discrimination of genotypes. The superiority of molecular markers over morphological characterization in fruit species is well established and widely accepted (Ercisli et al, 2007;Zamani et al, 2007;Duminil and Di Michele, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the number of descriptors can be quite limited, thus greatly reducing the power to distinguish consanguineous varieties [142]. Molecular marker technologies have been widely applied for characterization and utilization of germplasm in genebanks [143].…”
Section: Genetic Resource Management and Utilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphological properties have been the main character used for recognition and description of plant taxa (Duminil and Michele, 2009;Dwari and Mondal, 2011). The important role of morphology is attributable to its advantageous properties such as ease of examination, has high variation, has an established descriptive terminology and its accessibility to herbarium specimens (Szczepaniak and Ciéslak, 2011).…”
Section: Ajabsmentioning
confidence: 99%