2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant pathogenicity and associated/related detection systems. A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, implementing modern and efficient pathogen detection methods is imperative to minimize the losses caused by plant pathogens, including SRPs [114]. The new techniques based on nucleic acids or specific antigen detection are much faster, more sensitive, and more accurate than traditional microbiology [115]. Due to developments in molecular biology, the number of available PCR-based methods for detecting SRPs is constantly increasing [108,116,117] including quantitative ones [118,119].…”
Section: Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, implementing modern and efficient pathogen detection methods is imperative to minimize the losses caused by plant pathogens, including SRPs [114]. The new techniques based on nucleic acids or specific antigen detection are much faster, more sensitive, and more accurate than traditional microbiology [115]. Due to developments in molecular biology, the number of available PCR-based methods for detecting SRPs is constantly increasing [108,116,117] including quantitative ones [118,119].…”
Section: Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In loop-mediated isothermal amplification, it is possible to detect P. parmentieri with a detection limit of about 20 genomes (from gDNA isolation) or 10 CFU/mL of heat-killed bacterial cells [121]. ELISA-based methods, which could be good candidates for fast and reliable screening due to their simplicity, do not yet provide sufficient sensitivity for detecting SRPs in plant material [115]. Therefore, new methods based, for example, on immunosensors [122] or biosensors targeted for usage in the field have been created [123].…”
Section: Soft Rot Pectobacteriaceae Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the current development process, the main problem encountered is that the frequent occurrence of diseases has led to reduction of output or even crop failure. In order to reduce the loss of plant quality and economy caused by diseases, targeted screening and diagnosis in advance are required during plant growth ( Patel et al., 2023 ). The traditional way is manual identification, relying on experience, high cost and low accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lou and Zhang (2004) used PCR primers from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region to specifically detect G. sylvaticum [18]. However, PCR testing is time-consuming, requires specialized equipment and is difficult to use for field diagnoses [19]. To overcome these obstacles, many isothermal DNA amplification methods, such as loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), have been developed to diagnose plant pathogens in situ rapidly [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%