2010
DOI: 10.1603/en09217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Nutrients and the Spatiotemporal Distribution Dynamics of <I>Ceutorhynchus obstrictus</I> (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Its Parasitoids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was designed to distinguish among the contrasting predictions of the plant vigor and plant stress hypotheses on oviposition preference and larval performance of C. obstrictus. It is also recognized that N and S may have competing effects on aspects of C. obstrictus oviposition and development, similar to the effects observed in field experiments by Blake et al (2010). An overall goal of the study was to improve understanding of the environmental factors affecting oviposition choice and the resulting spatial structure of C. obstrictus populations within fields of B. napus, and so enable more effective strategies of control that require fewer inputs and reduce detrimental impacts on beneficial insects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The study was designed to distinguish among the contrasting predictions of the plant vigor and plant stress hypotheses on oviposition preference and larval performance of C. obstrictus. It is also recognized that N and S may have competing effects on aspects of C. obstrictus oviposition and development, similar to the effects observed in field experiments by Blake et al (2010). An overall goal of the study was to improve understanding of the environmental factors affecting oviposition choice and the resulting spatial structure of C. obstrictus populations within fields of B. napus, and so enable more effective strategies of control that require fewer inputs and reduce detrimental impacts on beneficial insects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%