Emerging Technologies and Management of Crop Stress Tolerance 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-800875-1.00005-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Elicited Induced Systemic Resistance and Tolerance in Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 191 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing the nature of microbe and its connection with particular plants be useful to control diseases in plants. There are several mechanisms for plant-microbe interactions which vary from plant to plant and microbe to microbe as well [ 4 ]. The interaction can materialize in any part of the plants, may it be underground or above the soil.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the nature of microbe and its connection with particular plants be useful to control diseases in plants. There are several mechanisms for plant-microbe interactions which vary from plant to plant and microbe to microbe as well [ 4 ]. The interaction can materialize in any part of the plants, may it be underground or above the soil.…”
Section: Editorialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For tests conducted in the greenhouse navel orange plants infected with HLB were irrigated with 1.5 L of B. amyloliquefaciens GJ1 (OD 600 ≈1) solution every week; after seven irrigations, the number of plants infected by the pathogen was reduced by 50% (Tang et al, 2018). It has been demonstrated that the ability to induce plant resistance or tolerance depends on the PGPB (Jain et al, 2014). To this regard, Riera et al (2018) tested the efficiency of seven bacterial isolates inoculated in ʻDuncanʼ grapefruit trees root to control citrus canker, and found that the Burkholderia territorri A63, B. metallica A53 and Pseudomonas geniculata 95 isolates significantly reduced the disease severity compared to that of the control plants.…”
Section: Fully Bilingualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En pruebas en invernadero, plantas de naranja navel enfermas de HLB fueron irrigadas con 1.5 L de la solución de B. amyloliquefaciens GJ1 (OD 600 ≈1) cada semana, después de siete irrigaciones, B. amyloliquefaciens GJ1 redujo el 50% de plantas con presencia del patógeno (Tang et al, 2018). Se ha demostrado que la capacidad para inducir resistencia o tolerancia en las plantas depende de la BPCP (Jain et al, 2014). Al respecto, Riera et al (2018) probaron la efectividad de siete aislamientos bacterianos inoculados a las raíces de árboles ʻDuncanʼ grapefruit en el control del cancro de los cítricos, encontrando que los aislados Burkholderia territorri A63, B. metallica A53 y Pseudomonas geniculata 95 redujeron significativamente la severidad de la enfermedad con respecto a las plantas control.…”
Section: Fully Bilingualunclassified
“…Other favorable but indirect actions of PGPRs on the rhizosphere include the biocontrol of phytopathogenic microorganisms via the production of substances like cianhidric acid (HCN), siderophores and antibiotics (Bakker et al, 2007). PGPR are also able to modulate plant stress by induced systemic tolerance (Jain et al, 2014) when plants are subject to abiotic adverse conditions such as high salinity, high temperatures and hydric stress. Some particular PGPRs such as Azospirillum sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%