2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant electrical signals: A multidisciplinary challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A transient inactivation of H + -ATPase in the plasma membrane is considered to be the main mechanism of VP generation [9,10]. AP is a short-term depolarization signal (mainly, seconds and tens of seconds) [4,[11][12][13] which is induced by stimuli with weak and moderate intensity and has a spike shape; its parameters are not dependent on the distance from the irritated zone. The generation of AP is mainly related to transient activation of calcium, anion, and potassium…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A transient inactivation of H + -ATPase in the plasma membrane is considered to be the main mechanism of VP generation [9,10]. AP is a short-term depolarization signal (mainly, seconds and tens of seconds) [4,[11][12][13] which is induced by stimuli with weak and moderate intensity and has a spike shape; its parameters are not dependent on the distance from the irritated zone. The generation of AP is mainly related to transient activation of calcium, anion, and potassium…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are a rapid-response signals generated by the instantaneous change in the electric potential gradient on the plasma membrane or alveolar leaf membrane [16]. All plants can produce long-distance electrical signals, which play a role in the communication of diverse tissues and organs, leading to the integration of environmental responses [17,18]. In recent years, the function of electrical signals in GLR-mediated plant resistance to biotic stress has attracted much attention [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support, mutating clade 3 GLR genes, such as GLR3.1 , GLR3.2 , GLR3.3 , or GLR3.6 , reduces Ca 2+ influx and also the duration of SWPs in local wounded leaves ( Mousavi et al, 2013 ). Propagation of SWP is particularly dependent on two GLR members, GLR3.3 and GLR3.6, which are expressed in the phloem and xylem contact cells, respectively, as SWP propagation in distal leaves is abolished in glr3.3 glr3.6 double mutants ( Mousavi et al, 2013 ; Salvador-Recatala, 2016 ; Toyota et al, 2018 ; Li et al, 2021 ; Moe-Lange et al, 2021 ). Similarly, OsGLR3.4, which is a clade 3 GLR member in rice, also functions in wound-induced SWP propagation ( Yu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Long-distance Signals In Response To Woundingmentioning
confidence: 99%