2019
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant DNA‐barcode library and community phylogeny for a semi‐arid East African savanna

Abstract: Applications of DNA barcoding include identifying species, inferring ecological and evolutionary relationships between species, and DNA metabarcoding. These applications require reference libraries that are not yet available for many taxa and geographic regions. We collected, identified, and vouchered plant specimens from Mpala Research Center in Laikipia, Kenya, to develop an extensive DNA‐barcode library for a savanna ecosystem in equatorial East Africa. We amassed up to five DNA barcode markers (rbcL, matK,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(102 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). We identified 213 unique food-plant sequences from 54 plant families, out of at least 460 plant species from 66 families that are known to occur at this site (27). These food plants were utilized differently by herbivore species (Dataset S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). We identified 213 unique food-plant sequences from 54 plant families, out of at least 460 plant species from 66 families that are known to occur at this site (27). These food plants were utilized differently by herbivore species (Dataset S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B (7, 7) Lepus sp. A (11,11) Papio anubis (7,9) Oryx gazella (22,20) Alcelaphus buselaphus (27,13) Ovis aries (48, 24) Capra hircus (19,19) Aepyceros melampus (129, 25) Nanger granti (46,17) Litocranius walleri (10, 10) Sylvicapra grimmia (2,2) Kobus ellipsiprymnus (6,6) Madoqua guentheri (120, 21) Oreotragus oreotragus (13,12) Bos taurus (163,27) Syncerus caffer (92,20) Taurotragus oryx (54, 27) Tragelaphus strepsiceros (28,15) Tragelaphus scriptus (12,7) Giraffa camelopardalis (58, 29) Hippopotamus amphibius (23,18) Phacochoerus africanus (30,22) Camelus dromedarius (39,18) Ceratotherium simum (13,12) Diceros bicornis (18,18) Equus asinus (29,20) Equus burchellii (106, 19) Equus grevyi (91, 21) Equus caballus (6,6) Heterohyrax brucei (9,9) Procavia capensis…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting amplicons were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq 2500. To identify food plants, we compared plant DNA sequences from faecal samples with reference DNA sequences from vouchered specimens (Gill et al, 2019; Kartzinel et al, 2015). In most cases, we either observed animals defecating or could identify species of origin based on dung size, shape, and consistency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local plant DNA library comprised 1,781 fertile vouchers (representing ~460 species from 66 families, nearly the entire local flora) collected in the study area from 2012 to 2018 (Gill et al, 2019). Specimen identifications were verified or refined by botanists (Dr. Paul Mutuku Musili and colleagues) at the East African Herbarium of the National Museums of Kenya, and with reference to five DNA markers: three standard plant DNA barcodes ( rbc L, mat K, and psb A‐ trn H), nuclear ITS, and the trn L sequences used as dietary markers (Gill et al, 2019; Kartzinel et al, 2015). Of the full‐length reference data evaluated by Gill et al (2019), trn L provided a higher degree of taxonomic resolution than did any other marker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation