2023
DOI: 10.1111/nph.19414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant chromosome engineering – past, present and future

Holger Puchta,
Andreas Houben

Abstract: SummarySpontaneous chromosomal rearrangements (CRs) play an essential role in speciation, genome evolution and crop domestication. To be able to use the potential of CRs for breeding, plant chromosome engineering was initiated by fragmenting chromosomes by X‐ray irradiation. With the rise of the CRISPR/Cas system, it became possible to induce double‐strand breaks (DSBs) in a highly efficient manner at will at any chromosomal position. This has enabled a completely new level of predesigned chromosome engineerin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 141 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the length of the exogenous radish chromosome was expected to be shorter than that of R2000, because R2000 was bred using irradiation to reduce the length of exogenous radish chromosome fragments [ 10 ]. As is known, subjecting organisms to X-ray irradiation can lead to chromosome fragment breakage [ 50 ]. As proven, the exogenous radish chromosome fragment can be efficiently shortened, although other methods have also been established to achieve this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the length of the exogenous radish chromosome was expected to be shorter than that of R2000, because R2000 was bred using irradiation to reduce the length of exogenous radish chromosome fragments [ 10 ]. As is known, subjecting organisms to X-ray irradiation can lead to chromosome fragment breakage [ 50 ]. As proven, the exogenous radish chromosome fragment can be efficiently shortened, although other methods have also been established to achieve this.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%