2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.29.227116
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plankton food webs of the Gulf of Mexico spawning grounds of Atlantic Bluefin tuna

Abstract: We used linear inverse ecosystem modeling techniques to assimilate data from extensive Lagrangian field experiments into a mass-balance constrained food web for the Gulf of Mexico open-ocean ecosystem. This region is highly oligotrophic, yet Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (ABT) travel long distances from feeding grounds in the North Atlantic to spawn there. Our results show that the food web is dominated by the microbial loop (>80% of net primary productivity is respired by heterotrophic bacteria and protists that f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, their TP ranges were not characterized according to colony size in our results and could mainly reflect their species-specific feeding ecology, as discussed in a previous study (Damian-Serrano et al, 2021). In contrast, tunicates consume phytoplankton-based particles via filterfeeding (Henschke et al, 2016;Stukel et al, 2020). Thus, the d 15 N Bulk values of tunicates were lower than those of other predators such as chaetognaths.…”
Section: Feeding Ecology Of Gelatinous Zooplanktoncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Nevertheless, their TP ranges were not characterized according to colony size in our results and could mainly reflect their species-specific feeding ecology, as discussed in a previous study (Damian-Serrano et al, 2021). In contrast, tunicates consume phytoplankton-based particles via filterfeeding (Henschke et al, 2016;Stukel et al, 2020). Thus, the d 15 N Bulk values of tunicates were lower than those of other predators such as chaetognaths.…”
Section: Feeding Ecology Of Gelatinous Zooplanktoncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…3 Figure 2b). This underestimates in situ active transport since organic excretion and zooplankton mortality at depth are not considered 19 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Realism could be added by incorporating the impact of maternal effects such as initializing egg weights based on the condition of spawning females. Because ABT are selective feeders, even within mesozooplankton size class ( Shiroza et al., this issue ), added realism may also be achieved by combining NEMURO-GoM with a zooplankton food web model ( Stukel et al., this issue ) to improve ingestion estimates. We note that initial comparisons of ABT recruitment times series and yearly larval survival predicted by the model do not agree well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%