Planar organosilicon polymers

Linsky, John P.; Paul, Thomas; Kenney, Malcolm E.

doi:10.1002/pol.1971.160090110

Cited by 15 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Dimethylphenyl Dimethyl [13] following works [6,7]. According to the latter works, fibrous, sheet polymers may be derived from chrysotile by an extraction-grafting process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pioneer studies on HCl and silylation treatments of chrysotile

Mendelovici

Frost

2005

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the light of some recent studies on organosilicon derivatives of HCl-leached chrysotile, pioneer works not cited in this area are chronologically and briefly commented on, emphasizing the infrared spectroscopy (FTIR-PAS) characterization of such chrysotile products. The latter have opened a far-reaching potential for the development of, e.g., highly stable hydrophobic or organophilic materials, including fibrous sheet polymers.

show abstract

“…Dimethylphenyl Dimethyl [13] following works [6,7]. According to the latter works, fibrous, sheet polymers may be derived from chrysotile by an extraction-grafting process.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pioneer studies on HCl and silylation treatments of chrysotile

Mendelovici

Frost

2005

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1)-are alternatives to spherical nanoparticles. Examples include organosilicon polymer nanotubes, [15] self-assembling lipid microtubes, [16][17][18][19][20] fullerene carbon nanotubes, [21][22][23][24] template-synthesized nanotubes, [25][26][27][28] and peptide nanotubes. [29][30][31][32] Nanotubes offer some interesting advantages relative to spherical nanoparticles for biotechnological applications.…”

Section: Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smart Nanotubes for Biotechnology and Biocatalysis

Martin¹,

Kohli²

2014

Dekker Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Third Edition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We believe that nanotubes offer some important advantages for biotechnological applications of nanoparticles. Because of its tremendous versatility in terms of materials that can be used, sizes that can be obtained, and chemistry and biochemistry that can be applied, the template method might prove to be a particularly advantageous approach for preparing nanotubes for such applications. However, this field of nanotube biotechnology is in its infancy, and there is much work to be performed before products based on this technology are brought to the market place. For example, in our applications to date, we have incorporated the payload into the nanotubes by either covalent bonding or other chemical interactions. However, in some applications, it might be useful to simply fill the nanotube with a payload and then apply caps to the nanotube ends to keep the payload encapsulated. Furthermore, it might be useful to have these caps fall off, thus spilling the payload, when a particular chemical or biochemical signal is detected. We are currently exploring routes for preparing such capped nanotubes. The issues of cost of production and mass production of nanotubes must also be addressed.

show abstract

“…In addition, they have electric, thermal, and optical properties as well as exceptional mechanical strengths [49–51]. In this regard, many types of functionalized CNTs have emerged during the last few decades, examples of which are self-assembling CNTs, template-synthesized CNTs, fullerene CNTs, peptide CNTs, and organosilica polymeric CNTs [50, 52–55]. The template-synthesized method is considered as the most convenient for the preparation of functionalized CNTs since it provides a simple means for attaching chemical and biochemical groups (such as silica, gold antibodies, etc.)…”

Section: Carbon Nanotubes (Cnts)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Nanoenabled Bioseparations: Current Developments and Future Prospects

Fahmy

Alawak

Brüßler

et al. 2019

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of nanomaterials in bioseparations has been recently introduced to overcome the drawbacks of the conventional methods. Different forms of nanomaterials, particularly magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), casted nanoporous membranes, and electrospun nanofiber membranes were utilized in biological separation for the aim of production of different biomolecules such as proteins, amino acids, nucleic acids, and enzymes. This paper critically reviews the state-of-the-art efforts undertaken in this regard, with emphasis on the synthesis and performance evaluation of each nanoform. Challenges and future prospects in developing nanoenabled bioseparations are also discussed, for the purpose of highlighting potential advances in the synthesis and fabrication of novel nanomaterials as well as in the design of efficient nanoenabled processes for separating a wide spectrum of biomolecules.

show abstract

Planar organosilicon polymers

Cited by 15 publications

References 5 publications

Pioneer studies on HCl and silylation treatments of chrysotile

Pioneer studies on HCl and silylation treatments of chrysotile

Smart Nanotubes for Biotechnology and Biocatalysis

Nanoenabled Bioseparations: Current Developments and Future Prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About