1992
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(92)80293-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar chips technology for miniaturization and integration of separation techniques into monitoring systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
645
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,009 publications
(662 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
645
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…With the standard photolithography and wet chemical etching techniques [19], the microchip was fabricated from a 6.3 cm × 6.3 cm soda lime glass substrate precoated with 145 nm Cr layer and 570 nm positive AZ1518 photoresist (Shaoguang Microelectronics Corp., Changsha, China). An imprinted photomask as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Microchipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the standard photolithography and wet chemical etching techniques [19], the microchip was fabricated from a 6.3 cm × 6.3 cm soda lime glass substrate precoated with 145 nm Cr layer and 570 nm positive AZ1518 photoresist (Shaoguang Microelectronics Corp., Changsha, China). An imprinted photomask as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Fabrication Of Microchipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of pumping is frequently employed in separation chemistry for capillary electrophoresis, traditionally in fused silica capillaries, but recently more and more in planar quartz structures [32][33][34]. It should be noted that this type of pump is of the current-source type.…”
Section: Electroosmotic Flow (Eof)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically speaking, flow cytometry was the first technique to analyze individual subcellular particles [1], so it is not surprising that many of the first analyses of large populations of individual microparticles [2][3][4][5][6][7], cells [8,9], and subcellular particles [10] on microfluidic devices also used flow cytometry. Electrophoretic separation schemes have also been used since the first glass microfluidic devices were described by Manz et al [11] and Harrison et al [12,13] and they continue to be quite popular due to ease of application. IEF [14] and electrophoresis [15] on microfluidic devices have been used to determine mitochondrial pI and electrophoretic mobility, respectively, both of which can be used to evaluate differences in the surface characteristics of biological particles [14,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LIF was used in the first microfluidic devices [11][12][13] because its power as a detection scheme made it an ideal match for the small sample quantities and, typically, pL-sized detection volumes. Ocvirk et al [20] later pioneered the use of epifluorescence in microfluidics, which focuses the laser and collects the fluorescence through the same objective, and achieved a zmol LOD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%