2015 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ettlis.2015.7048212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plagiarism in research: Special reference to initiatives taken by Indian organisations

Abstract: With the advent of Internet and new technologies variety of information sources are coming up. The thirst of information in R&D activities has become ever growing and ever demanding. The information is becoming more digital and people are getting easy access to abundant information which leads to the temptation of using and copying it and stealing other ideas without knowing the implications and without acknowledging the original contributor in completion of their research and projects. The act of stealing ori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Duplichecker.com no solo se considera como posible alternativa libre para revisar presencia de copia textual en diferentes idiomas (Tullu & Karande, 2017;Gilliver, 2012;Nisha, Senthil & Bakhshi, 2015), sino que otros la proponen como una de las mejores herramientas web "antiplagio" (Ramaraj & Thanamani, 2014). A pesar de ello, este software no escapa a los falsos resultados reportándose solo un 48 % de efectividad y una utilidad marginal para detectar plagio de fuentes de internet (Weber-Wulff, Möller, Touras & Zincke, 2014).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified
“…Duplichecker.com no solo se considera como posible alternativa libre para revisar presencia de copia textual en diferentes idiomas (Tullu & Karande, 2017;Gilliver, 2012;Nisha, Senthil & Bakhshi, 2015), sino que otros la proponen como una de las mejores herramientas web "antiplagio" (Ramaraj & Thanamani, 2014). A pesar de ello, este software no escapa a los falsos resultados reportándose solo un 48 % de efectividad y una utilidad marginal para detectar plagio de fuentes de internet (Weber-Wulff, Möller, Touras & Zincke, 2014).…”
Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified