2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2009.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of the phase-shift method for determining adsorption isotherms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) and (2) show that the effect of R P on −φ for intermediate frequencies is negligible. These aspects are completely overlooked, confused, and misunderstood in the comments on the phase-shift method by Horvat-Radosevic et al [30,32,34]. Correspondingly, all of the simulations of the phase-shift method using Eq.…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Backgrounds Of The Phase-shift mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) and (2) show that the effect of R P on −φ for intermediate frequencies is negligible. These aspects are completely overlooked, confused, and misunderstood in the comments on the phase-shift method by Horvat-Radosevic et al [30,32,34]. Correspondingly, all of the simulations of the phase-shift method using Eq.…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Backgrounds Of The Phase-shift mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, all of the simulations of the phase-shift method using Eq. (1) that appear in these comments (where C P does not include C D ) [30,32,34] are basically invalid or wrong [27,28]. All of the analyses of the effect of R P on −φ for intermediate frequencies are also invalid or wrong (see Supporting Information of Refs.…”
Section: Theoretical and Experimental Backgrounds Of The Phase-shift mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These aspects are completely overlooked, confused, and misunderstood in the comments on the phase-shift method by HorvatRadosevic, Kvastek, and Lasia. 27,29,31) Correspondingly, all of the simulations of the phase-shift method using Eq. (1) that appear in these comments (where C P does not include C D ) 27,29,31) are basically invalid or wrong.…”
Section: Simplified Equivalent Circuit For the Phaseshift Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27,29,31) Correspondingly, all of the simulations of the phase-shift method using Eq. (1) that appear in these comments (where C P does not include C D ) 27,29,31) are basically invalid or wrong. 25,26) All of the analyses of the effect of R P on −ϕ for intermediate frequencies are also invalid or wrong (see Supporting Information of Refs.…”
Section: Simplified Equivalent Circuit For the Phaseshift Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation