2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40101-019-0193-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls of assessment of autonomic function by heart rate variability

Abstract: Although analysis of heart rate variability is widely used for the assessment of autonomic function, its fundamental framework linking low-frequency and high-frequency components of heart rate variability with sympathetic and parasympathetic autonomic divisions has developed in the 1980s. This simplified framework is no longer able to deal with much evidence about heart rate variability accumulated over the past half-century. This review addresses the pitfalls caused by the old framework and discusses the poin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
161
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(175 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
8
161
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current pilot study, using novel proximity tagging technology, we show that stress index was lower, and HRV parameters (SDNN, rMSSD, HF) were higher when caregivers were in the presence of their dogs and inactive (lying, sitting, standing combined), as well as when in the presence of their dogs while sitting, vs. away from their dogs, over a 24-hr period. We also show that rMSDD and HF, two HRV parameters often reported in human-animal interaction research, were affected by body position, supporting the recommendation that posture, along with activity level, should be taken into consideration while measuring long-term HRV [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In the current pilot study, using novel proximity tagging technology, we show that stress index was lower, and HRV parameters (SDNN, rMSSD, HF) were higher when caregivers were in the presence of their dogs and inactive (lying, sitting, standing combined), as well as when in the presence of their dogs while sitting, vs. away from their dogs, over a 24-hr period. We also show that rMSDD and HF, two HRV parameters often reported in human-animal interaction research, were affected by body position, supporting the recommendation that posture, along with activity level, should be taken into consideration while measuring long-term HRV [33].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…-ECG recorded connection; -Two static volume measurements using a dilution technique (normal breathing frequency: respiratory rate of 20-25/min): 5 min for each recording. These two measurements allowed the calculation of the static volumes as recommended (Wanger et al, 2005); -One functional residual capacity (FRC) measurement using a dilution technique with slow-paced breathing recording at six cycles per minute [5 s of inspiration, 5 s of expiration: 5 min as previously described (Garcia-Araújo et al, 2015)] in order to study respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) that is recognized as a physiological mechanism to ensure optimal ventilation-perfusion matching within the lungs (Hayano and Yuda, 2019); -Exhaled NO measurement at multiple flow rates to calculate alveolar NO concentration (C alv,NO ) and maximal bronchial NO flux (J' aw,NO ) as previously described (Mahut et al, 2004). J' aw,NO has been correlated to both subepithelial eosinophilic infiltration and reticular basement membrane thickness, two asthma characteristics (Mahut et al, 2004).…”
Section: Pulmonary Function Tests and Hrv Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lucini et al (2018) determined that the HRV variables can be classified in three independent factors that were used: oscillatory domain (HFnu, LFnu, LF/HF ratio, and possibly HFnu), amplitude domain (Ptot, HFa, and LFa) and a pulse domain (HR and mean RR). When HR fluctuations mediated by autonomic nerves are observed in HF band (>0.15 Hz), it is mediated by the cardiac vagus (Hayano and Yuda, 2019).…”
Section: Pulmonary Function Tests and Hrv Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an exhaustive explanation of all the common HRV metrics, their calculation, meaning, and clinical use, we referred to the study by Shaffer et al, Hayano et al and the guidelines of the task force of the European society of cardiology and the North American society of pacing and electrophysiology (Hayano & Yuda, 2019; "Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology," 1996;F.…”
Section: Hrvmentioning
confidence: 99%