1990
DOI: 10.1067/mva.1990.18519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in lower extremity venous duplex scanning

Abstract: Results of scans performed on 1074 patients over an 18-month period were evaluated to define the limitations of lower extremity venous duplex scanning. Eighty-four patients had confirmatory phlebography performed within 24 hours of their venous duplex scanning. In 71 patients scans were considered diagnostic (sensitivity 91%, specificity 95%). Eighteen studies (13 equivocal, 5 misinterpretations) were scrutinized to determine the limitations of venous duplex scanning compared to phlebography and are the focus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably due to the deep course of this vein segment as it enters Hunter's canal. Similar observations have also been reported by others [1,17]. Flow was present in all of these noncompressible distal femoral vein segments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This is probably due to the deep course of this vein segment as it enters Hunter's canal. Similar observations have also been reported by others [1,17]. Flow was present in all of these noncompressible distal femoral vein segments.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, there are still questions about the significance of small, distal thrombi, especially the asymptomatic ones. Therefore, the standard is changing towards venous Doppler ultrasonography, which can be repeated, is non-invasive and is highly sensitive to symptomatic thrombi of the lower extremities and asymptomatic, proximal DVT [1, 2, 22], even though ultrasound has a lower sensitivity than venography [10, 13]. We found no DVTs by venography in 17 patients eight days after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Without proper prophylaxis, hip prosthesis surgery and abdominal cancer surgery have a 70% and 30% risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) respectively [1, 2]. The use of pre- and postoperative low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has reduced the incidence of symptomatic VTE to around 3%, with an incidence of fatal pulmonary embolus of 0.2 - 0.7% [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,12,14 As color flow duplex ultrasonography (CFDU) scan has evolved to become the imaging method of choice for investigating CVT, CVT isolated to the veins draining the gastrocnemius and soleal muscles is being recognized with greater frequency. 3,5,7,9,15,16 CFDU has been reported to have a diagnostic sensitivity of 94% to 100%, specificity of 91% to 100%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 94% for detection of thrombus at the level of the tibial and peroneal veins. 3,4,7,9,13,16,17 In a prospective study of 5250 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), acute DVT was documented with CFDU in 14% of patients, with 4.8% of patients having thrombi isolated to the veins of the calf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3,5,7,9,15,16 CFDU has been reported to have a diagnostic sensitivity of 94% to 100%, specificity of 91% to 100%, positive predictive value of 80%, and negative predictive value of 94% for detection of thrombus at the level of the tibial and peroneal veins. 3,4,7,9,13,16,17 In a prospective study of 5250 patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT), acute DVT was documented with CFDU in 14% of patients, with 4.8% of patients having thrombi isolated to the veins of the calf. Forty percent of these isolated CVTs were limited to the veins draining the gastrocnemius and soleal muscles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%