2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-4038-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls in application of the conventional chloride mass balance (CMB) in karst aquifers and use of the generalised CMB method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the CMB method may present limitations in some disadvantageous hydrogeological contexts [53,54], some additional processes must be considered for recharge evaluations in Las Cañadas aquifer system, such as (1) the possibility of mixing chloride flow mass rates produced by recharge infiltrated at different elevations [20]; (2) the variable rainfall-runoff partitioning and recharge mechanisms, land use, and soil-vegetation conditions with elevation [14]; (3) the potential contribution of non-atmospheric chloride to groundwater from endogenous halides and human activities [21]; and (4) the potential storage of chloride in the soil and vadose zones [8,17].…”
Section: The Chloride Mass Balance (Cmb) Methods Application In the Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the CMB method may present limitations in some disadvantageous hydrogeological contexts [53,54], some additional processes must be considered for recharge evaluations in Las Cañadas aquifer system, such as (1) the possibility of mixing chloride flow mass rates produced by recharge infiltrated at different elevations [20]; (2) the variable rainfall-runoff partitioning and recharge mechanisms, land use, and soil-vegetation conditions with elevation [14]; (3) the potential contribution of non-atmospheric chloride to groundwater from endogenous halides and human activities [21]; and (4) the potential storage of chloride in the soil and vadose zones [8,17].…”
Section: The Chloride Mass Balance (Cmb) Methods Application In the Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the onset of receiving surface runoff, these sinkholes become active and would act as the sources of point recharge (Figure 9). Somaratne (2015b) reports that during the 1986 flood event, discharge to the Scowns sinkhole was measured at the rate of 500-2000 m O data were used to infer the degree of mixing along flow paths from the primary recharge source (Poocher Swamp) to the sampling point. In a karsitic aquifer composition of groundwater chemistry at a sampling point represents a contribution from matrix and conduit flow components.…”
Section: Evidence From Em Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Equation (1) to hold after replacing cR with groundwater chloride (cg), cR must be in equilibrium with cg (saturated version of CMB) [3]. This is not the case with point recharge through sinkholes as Werner [2] anticipates, as point recharge occupies mostly conduit porosity areas.…”
Section: −3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al [18] highlights that for the saturated version of CMB to be applicable; groundwater movement in both unsaturated and saturated zones should be approximated as one-dimensional piston flow. This essentially means that chloride concentration of the mass flux crossing the piezometric surface (cR) is at equilibrium with groundwater chloride (cg) [3]. When chloride concentrations of groundwater samples (cg) are used as cR values in Equation (1) for saturated zone application, the recharge rates determined from the conventional CMB apply to locations in the catchment where the samples are recharged, not where the samples are collected [3].…”
Section: −3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation