2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2005.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pitfalls and ambiguities in antibody screening in patients with cardiac assist devices: The role of flow PRA beads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activity was detectable 18 to 228 days (mean 81 days) after implantation and only after incubation with the anti‐human IgG detection antibody, demonstrating that this is an antibody response to non‐HLA determinants. Similar findings have been reported in LVAD patients receiving ABO identical, leucodepleted blood products, in which 10 of 11 LVAD patients were positive with all wells in an HLA ELISA within 60 days of LVAD implantation, but negative by CDC (15,16). This dubious reactivity in our series disappeared between 8 and 41 days (mean 19.83 ± 12.37) after transplantation (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This activity was detectable 18 to 228 days (mean 81 days) after implantation and only after incubation with the anti‐human IgG detection antibody, demonstrating that this is an antibody response to non‐HLA determinants. Similar findings have been reported in LVAD patients receiving ABO identical, leucodepleted blood products, in which 10 of 11 LVAD patients were positive with all wells in an HLA ELISA within 60 days of LVAD implantation, but negative by CDC (15,16). This dubious reactivity in our series disappeared between 8 and 41 days (mean 19.83 ± 12.37) after transplantation (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%