Pitch Discrimination: Are Professional Musicians Better than Non-Musicians?

Abstract

Musicians are typically considered to exhibit exceptional auditory skills. Only few studies, however, have substantiated this in basic psychoacoustic tasks. The purpose of the present investigation was to expand our knowledge on basic auditory abilities of musicians compared to non-musicians. Specific goals were: (1) to compare frequency discrimination thresholds (difference limen for frequency [DLF]) of non-musical pure tones in controlled groups of professional musicians and non-musicians; (2) to relate DLF performance to musical background; and (3) to compare DLF thresholds obtained with two threshold estimation procedures: 2-and 3-interval forced choice procedures (2IFC and 3IFC). Subjects were 16 professional musicians and 14 non-musicians. DLFs were obtained for three frequencies (0.25, 1 and 1.5 kHz) using the 3IFC adaptive procedure, and for one frequency (1 kHz) also using the 2IFC. Three threshold estimates were obtained for each frequency, procedure and subject. The results of the present study support five major findings: (a) mean DLFs for musicians were approximately half the values of the nonmusicians; (b) significant learning for both groups during the three threshold estimations; (c) classical musicians performed better than those with contemporary musical background; (d) performance was influenced by years of musical experience; and (e) both groups showed better DLF in a 2IFC paradigm compared to the 3IFC. These data highlight the importance of short-term training on an auditory task, auditory memory and factors related to musical background (such as musical genre and years of experience) on auditory performance. KEYWORDS frequency discrimination, frequency difference limen, DLF, musicians 126 Brought to you by |

Diurnal Changes of ERP Response to Sound Stimuli of Varying Frequency in Morning-type and Evening-type Subjects

“…The reason for the diurnal variation of P300 latency occurring only under the high-frequency condition is unclear. It may be that subjects were more sensitive to the highfrequency stimuli than that to the low-frequency stimuli (Sek and Moore, 1995;Kishon-Rabin et al, 2001).…”

Auditory frequency discrimination learning is affected by stimulus variability

“…The participants were assigned to three groups that were matched for age and sex (see Table 1). The groups were also matched for number of participants who played a musical instrument, since professional musicians have lower pitch discrimination thresholds than nonmusicians (Kishon-Rabin, Amir, Vexler, & Zaltz, 2001). Because pitch discrimination is also correlated with IQ measures (Deary, 1994), we administered the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI; Psychological Corporation, 1999).…”

Triagem da Afinação Vocal: comparação do desempenho de musicistas e não musicistas

“…Musicians had more right matches for isolate tones than non-musicians (Table 1). It is known that musicians have better frequency perception and discrimination than non--musicians (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) and the lack of musical exposure may be one of the causes for a possible pitch-matching inaccuracy (2) . During the task that involved the reproduction of a sound sequencing of frequency patterns, musicians also showed a better performance when compared to non-musicians (Table 2).…”

“…It is known that musical experience enhance auditory perception, both of duration and frequency, given that musicians are superior to non-musicians (18)(19)(20) . When comparing isolate tone tasks with tone sequencing, both groups had more right matches at the isolate tone task and, for the NMG, the sequencing task turned out to be more difficult ( Table 3), showing that it seems that musical learning, either formal or informal, helps the individual to overcome this greater difficulty that is the sound sequencing (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) . This fact corroborates the study that concluded that the longer the sequence of auditory stimuli for the sequencing task, the more difficult the activity becomes, since it involves a greater number of auditory abilities (12) and a greater auditory processing refinement (21) .…”