2014
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pipeline for illumination correction of images for high‐throughput microscopy

Abstract: The presence of systematic noise in images in high-throughput microscopy experiments can significantly impact the accuracy of downstream results. Among the most common sources of systematic noise is non-homogeneous illumination across the image field. This often adds an unacceptable level of noise, obscures true quantitative differences and precludes biological experiments that rely on accurate fluorescence intensity measurements.In this paper, we seek to quantify the improvement in the quality of high-content… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
85
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a uniformly fluorescent reference image (“white-referencing”), while common, is not suitable to high-throughput screening. A retrospective method to correct all acquired images on a per-channel, per-plate basis is therefore recommended 41 ; the illumination pipeline takes this approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of a uniformly fluorescent reference image (“white-referencing”), while common, is not suitable to high-throughput screening. A retrospective method to correct all acquired images on a per-channel, per-plate basis is therefore recommended 41 ; the illumination pipeline takes this approach.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The illumination correction pipeline aggregates the fluorescent images on a per-plate basis to produce a post-hoc estimate of the 2-D illumination distribution, one for each channel, per plate. We have found that this corrective step improves the ability to detect subtle phenotypic differences in profiling applications 41 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…To account for systematic bias due to non-homogeneous illumination across the image field, all images were illumination-corrected [12]. A dedicated CellProfiler pipeline loaded all the images from the plate and averaged them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In imaging based systems, such as HCS, spatial variation of illumination intensity or detection sensitivity (or both), often seen as reduced intensity in the corners, can contribute to apparent variation in the cell-to-cell measurements. Methods for correcting non-uniform illumination or detection sensitivity are available [52, 53], but often are not used because variation across the field, especially when it is stable from field-to-field, has little impact on the population average values that are most often used as assay readouts. However, for heterogeneity analysis it is important to understand the impact of the detection system on cell-to-cell variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%