2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pilot use of 3-dimensional photography to aid clinical decision-making in craniofacial morphea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the study period, the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT) was not utilized during routine care at our institution, leaving room for inter-observer variability [ 53 ]. Three-dimensional photography has been proposed as an additional tool for monitoring patients with head variants of linear morphea and may provide an additional strategy for objective assessment of disease course [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the study period, the Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool (LoSCAT) was not utilized during routine care at our institution, leaving room for inter-observer variability [ 53 ]. Three-dimensional photography has been proposed as an additional tool for monitoring patients with head variants of linear morphea and may provide an additional strategy for objective assessment of disease course [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a noninvasive, radiation-free imaging modality that has emerged as a potential tool for detecting and quantifying asymmetry in CM. 4,5 Although well-known in the plastic surgery community as a validated means by which to evaluate the success of reconstructive procedures in the setting of facial trauma and other craniofacial disorders, the adoption of 3D stereophotogrammetry by the dermatology community has lagged behind. 6 A recent pilot study 4 demonstrated the ability of 3D stereophotogrammetry to detect pathologic asymmetry in patients with CM, including occult asymmetry not appreciable on clinical examination results alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%